Category Archives: Andrew Hales

Comfort Movies and Why We Love Them

This holiday weekend, like most holiday weekends, involves many traditions including beach trips, cook outs, and one of my personal favorites, TV movie marathons.  After a long day out in the hot sun BBQing or splashing in a pool, few things are quite as enjoyable as coming home, flopping down on the couch and turning on the TV to see that some cable network is running an all day long marathon of your favorite movie series.  It doesn’t seem to matter how many times I’ve seen Star Wars, I am always willing to spend a few hours sitting around watching Han, Luke, and Leia as they battle the evil Galactic Empire. As Mom’s mac & cheese or meatloaf is comfort food for the stomach, so favorite movies are a sort of comfort food for the brain, making us come back to them time after time.  A true “comfort movie” is well made, universally understood, and has been watched over and over.

These movies speak to us in ways that other movies don’t and take us to places we’ve only seen in our imaginations.  Although there are plenty of movies the tap into our imagination, these particular movies give birth to fully realized universes, completely self-contained and yet ever expanding, of such a sweeping scope that they blow us away.  They tell us stories of action and adventure on such an epic scale that even the most adventurous of us find it difficult to fathom.  For a few hours we can travel through the galaxy fighting evil aliens or go on missions as the most elite of secret agents only find ourselves still on the couch at the end of the escapade, satisfied, but no worse for wear.

Not only do comfort movies speak to our imagination, they also tap into something deeper. The use of mythological archetypes in Star Wars is well documented. George Lucas was a student of the late mythologist and author Joseph Campbell and Campbell’s influence can be seen throughout the original trilogy.  By using these archetypes, Lucas made Star Wars, both plot and characters, instantly recognizable and relatable. Although it was told in a new and different way, the story felt familiar, like ancient lore that just hadn’t quite been able to take form until this movie.  With Campbell’s help as a consultant, Lucas tapped into those shared cultural ideas that speak to us all, regardless of our personal backgrounds.  Many of the characters in the movie are mirror images of figures that can be found in myths from around the world.  It is amazing that Star Wars still resonates just as strongly with new viewers thirty six years after its release as it did when it first came to theaters. It inspires them, just as the myths that Star Wars was derived from inspired countless generations before.

It’s not just the cultural significance of these movies that make us love them. They also look fantastic. Who doesn’t remember watching Indy trying to swap an idol for a bag of sand or seeing Terminator 2: Judgment Day’s T-1000 walk right through the metal bars of the mental hospital’s security doors to get at John Connor.  These movies are made with love and care, and their creators obviously put more than a little bit of themselves into them.  It shows.  From casting to special effects, each element was carefully thought out and the best choices made.  Often, these choices pay great dividends as the film holds up long after other contemporary films look like complete garbage.  Twenty two years later the T-1000 still looks amazing, and yet similar effects, such as the Silver Surfer, don’t hold up even a few years after the movie’s release. It’s the high level of artistry and care, pushing the boundaries of available technology, and a bit of dumb luck that sets certain movies above the rest.  For Star Wars, George Lucas had to create a whole special effects studio and they in turn had to build all their equipment from scratch.  It was over a year before they were able to shoot any of the effects scenes, but despite Lucas’ continual updates, the original film still looks great.

Image

This still looks so cool!

Even a film’s score makes a difference. Who doesn’t know the “Imperial March” from Star Wars and doesn’t understand its evil undertones?  More than once I’ve started humming the theme when a menacing someone walks past me at work.  Everyone around me understands what is going on and the significance of the melody without my having to say a word.

Comfort movies are also enjoyable because they are familiar.  Like a favorite pair of jeans, they are broken in to fit just right and feel great.  We’ve watched them dozens of times and can quote their entirety by heart.  Even though we know exactly what is going to happen we still watch eagerly.  We love these movies because we know them so well.  We can sit around with our friends and have an in depth conversation, packed full of minutia and quotable lines and not get bored.

Kevin Smith really hit on this familiarity in his movie Clerks, when Dante and Randall discuss the contractors who were working on the second Death Star when it was destroyed.  At face value, a conversation this serious about an invented scenario in a made up world is absolutely ridiculous and yet I know I’ve had more than my fair share of discussions just like this.  In fact, the ability to have this type of conversation with others who also know them by heart adds to our enjoyment of our favorite films. We know there are aspects that make no sense or have no bearing in reality and yet we choose to accept this as part of the movie’s charm and instead use it as fuel for these colorful exchanges that only enhance our enjoyment of and our connection to the universe in which they are set.

The right mixture of these elements gives these movies a certain “X” factor—something we can’t quite analyze quantitatively and yet we know exists.  Comfort movies fill an important spot in our lives that isn’t contented by anything else.  They are the reliable entertainment that we can turn to like an old friend to make us feel at ease.  This is why we love them so much.

Leave a comment

Filed under Andrew Hales, Movies

Killing Time till Game of Thrones S4

Now that HBO’s Game of Thrones is over for the season, I’ve been trying to figure out what to do with my newly found free time while I wait nearly a year for the next season to start.  Given how dedicated geeks can be to our favorite shows and movies, I’ve compiled a few suggestions on how to pass the time while waiting for the next season to start:

1)  Catch up on chores around the house.  While that eight foot tall, Leaning Tower of Pisa made entirely of dishes may not bother you, it’s still probably a good idea to take care of it before your neighbors or roommates call the Health Department.

2)  Exercise. I’m sure that the couch is really comfortable (mine is), and you really don’t like sweating (Amen!), but we geeks have a reputation for not being in the best of shape.  Just think of it as playing an RPG: if you don’t level up, you will get your ass kicked. Maybe it’ll even help you pick up that hot booth babe at your next con (Look, a man can dream, can’t he!).

3)  Learn a new skill.  Maybe you can learn woodworking, or how to cook.  You can even give your creations some geek flair. What better way to start off your season premiere party than with a huge platter of Klingon Gagh?  A few weeks ago we shared an article from Popular Mechanics explaining how to make a vintage style gaming table.  How cool would it be to show this off to all your friends? It would make them greener than the Hulk!

4)  Spend time with your family.  Remember those people who love you?  Yeah, them.  You’ve probably been ignoring them for the last few weeks while you’ve been obsessing.  Time to remind them you’re still alive.  Go ahead!  Give grandma a call.  I’m sure she’d love to hear from you.

5)  Expand your geek knowledge. Recently we mentioned that knowledge is a key element of being a geek, so take this down time to expand your horizons.  I know I am.  Check out that run of X-Men you’ve always meant to read; or maybe finally get around to playing that X-box game your friends have been raving about for the last 5 years (I’m kind of ashamed of the stack of games I’ve got that I have yet to play).

There are approximately 300 days left until the Season 4 Game of Thrones premier.  Go forth, and use them wisely!!   (Or just read all the posts on the Song of Ice and Fire Forum.)

2 Comments

Filed under Andrew Hales, Geek Life

Review: World War Z

Image

I’m kind of over the whole zombie thing. Over the last few years people have gone a little zombie crazy and the market is well beyond saturation at this point.  Also, I was not particularly thrilled to find out that this movie was basically World War Z in name only.  I am a huge fan of the book and had really been looking forward to seeing it made for the big screen.  My enthusiasm quickly faded a few days ago when I came across an interview with author Max Brooks.  Brooks, son of comedy genius Mel Brooks and actress Anne Bancroft, is no stranger to Hollywood and was well aware that his novel wouldn’t make it to the screen intact.  In the interview Brooks said that people should see the movie and judge it strictly as a movie.

Image

Max Brooks and me at NYCC 2010

While not going so far as to endorse the film, Brooks made a very good point by telling people to evaluate it on its own merit.  I knew there was a very real chance that even though this movie was not going to be the book brought to life, it could still be a pretty good story in its own right.  And so with that thought in mind, I went forth and saw World War Z.

As it turns out, World War Z is a pretty solid action flick.  It is most definitely not the book, but that is okay. A few elements from the book were introduced to give the movie a similar feel, but I don’t really think those were necessary.  The main character Gerry Lane, played by Brad Pitt, is a former UN investigator who is trying to figure out how and where the “zombie” plague began in exchange for his family’s safety onboard a US Navy ship.  I use quotes for “zombie” because the characters in the movie, like those in the book, acknowledge how ridiculous mythical zombies are and use the word only to describe the virus in terms that are easily understandable.  Lane’s search takes him on an impressive tour of much of the globe, hitting South Korea, Israel, Wales, and Nova Scotia. Viewers are treated to some stupendous aerial and wide angle shots of the surrounding scenery (albeit, usually covered with the stumbling infected).  Interspersed among these great shots are some pretty standard, though well-crafted, action sequences.  Since this is a zombie movie, there are plenty of escape scenes and crowd chases, but none of these feel tired or played out, as can often be the case in this genre.   I really appreciated the fact that the film got off to a quick start, giving a brief introduction to the characters and then rolling right into the action.  I absolutely hate when a movie takes forty-five minutes to get finally get to the real heart of the plot and then rushes through it to get to some massive climax.

Often times what makes or breaks a movie like this is the acting.  Aside from Pitt, there weren’t any other big name actors I recognized, but everyone gave a consistent performance across the board.  A big film with plenty of money to spend on effects rarely fails because of the visuals, and a big name, leading actor can only lift the movie so much, so it comes down to the supporting cast to either keep the film afloat, or torpedo it.  The only two really standout performances were by actors playing zombies towards the conclusion.  Both play mindless, spastic undead wonderfully, and give them disturbed personalities of their own.  From bugged-eyed head banging to chattering teeth and dog-like sniffing, they make it truly believable that these creatures, though once human, are now something entirely different.

Image

Whenever Brad Pitt starts running around with the supporting cast, bad things are about to happen.

There are some things that were included that I could have really done without.  First on that list, and probably the ones I find most annoying, are the quick cuts through file footage of riots, wars, natural disasters and the like that start off the movie; and the similarly cut, faux news reports of people fighting back and receiving aid that wraps up the film.  This has been done so many times it honestly makes me want to hurl.  I get what the filmmakers are trying to accomplish but it is cliché and the time for new material has come.  I was also turned off by how fast those who had been bitten turned into zombies.  I think that much of the terror and suspense of a zombie film comes from the impending transformation.  Every time somebody gets bitten it is understood that before long they will be joining the ranks of the undead, but that it will be a slow and horrifying process. Just thinking about it makes the skin crawl.  In World War Z, the whole process from bite to full on zombie takes ten to twelve second.  The virus acts unrealistically rapidly, even faster than almost any kind of venom, poison or nerve agent in real life.

This removes almost any believability from the transformation which doesn’t have much to start with.  My final complaint about the movie concerns the PG-13 rating.  I have nothing against the film having a PG-13 rating, but in order to get this rating, the film makers seriously cut back the on-screen violence.  This led to a few shots that reminded me of R movies that have been cut so they could be shown on cable. What is happening just off screen is obvious and the attempts to avoid showing it just seem awkward.

The movie ends as many zombie movies end:  open to glimmers of hope.  I have yet to hear of a World War Z sequel and while there is room for it if they’d like to do one, the fact that the film was wrapped up enough to stand on its own pleased me.  While World War Z may not be rated among 2013’s greatest movies, it was certainly a strong addition to a genre that often fails to change or adapt and frequently feels played out. There is a real chance that diehard fans of the book will be disappointed if they are unwilling to take the advice of author Max Brooks and judge the movie on its own merits.  As for the rest of us, it’s worth checking out.  World War Z has earned itself a solid 3 Death Stars.

Image

PS,

While this ending sounds pretty Badass, I’m quite happy with the one that made it into the film.

Leave a comment

Filed under Andrew Hales, Movie Reviews, Movies

Review: Man of Steel

Warning: This review contains spoilers for Man of Steel.

Image

I spent nearly all last weekend humming the theme from Superman.  This was, of course, in preparation to go see Man of Steel last Sunday.  I wouldn’t say I was excited about this movie, but I was certainly optimistic.  Knowing that both Christopher Nolan and Zach Snyder were involved gave me hope that this wouldn’t be another disaster like Superman Returns.  So on Sunday afternoon I happily hopped in my car and drove off to see what this latest Superman installment had to offer.

Thankfully, there is plenty of good to say about this movie.  First off there is the casting.  With one exception, this movie boasts an outstanding cast.  Even the small roles in this film were enjoyable to watch.  Regular sci-fi movie and TV viewers will certainly recognize several character actors.  A personal favorite of mine, Richard Schiff of West Wing fame, had a fantastic supporting role as Dr. Emil Hamilton.  A couple of surprise performances really stood out in the leading roles.  Chief among these is Kevin Costner as Jonathan Kent.  His performance is all the best of Field of Dreams, with none of the debacle that was Waterworld.  He demonstrates fabulous understanding of his character’s place in this world, acting as a guiding light for the young and unsure Clark.

Russell Crowe also impresses as doomed Kryptonian scientist Jor-El.  Even when he returns as a hologram, Crowe manages to project a solid screen presence.  There was something quite fitting about watching these two outstanding fathers on Father’s Day.

Diane Lane plays a very capable Martha Kent.  Although one scene between Lane and a young Clark in his elementary school was awkward and a bit lacking, the scenes between adult Clark and his mother are fantastic.  One in particular outside their home is both emotionally touching and visually quite appealing, with wonderful lighting from a seemingly endless sky.  Although she is always the caring, loving mother, she is by no means a shrinking violet.  Like many farm raised women, she also has a tough side that is harder than steel, appropriate given the man who is her adopted son.

Image

Is there a barber in the house?!

Speaking of steel, tall and handsome, with a head of thick black hair (minus the Christopher Reeve curl, thank God), Henry Cavill certainly looks the part of the man himself, and convincingly steps into some pretty big tights left behind by a sizeable list of actors.

The role of Superman is always a difficult one to play because in reality it’s actually two very different characters that look identical.  In fact, previous films have considered casting two separate actors to play each half of Kal-el’s nature; but in this film, Cavill captures both personas very well.  This Clark is written less like the Christopher Reeves’ Clark and more like Smallville’s Clark played by Tom Welling.  Personally, I would have liked to see more of the awkward, bumbling, yet oh-so-loveable Clark Kent of the Daily Planet and am looking forward to seeing more of him in future films.  Cavill’s portrayal focused mostly on the alienation Clark feels because his powers keep him from fitting in.  While this was an important plot point in the evolution of Superman, it probably should have been less emphasized and drawn out.

My only casting complaint comes in the form of Amy Adams as Lois Lane.  Instead of having a spunky, devil-may-care attitude, Adams plays Lane with recklessness and disregard that is more than a little alarming.  I regularly found myself asking why in Krypton Lois was doing something that no marginally sane person would ever attempt.  I also found Adams to be an unconvincing romantic interest. Superman and Lois’s relationship is one of the staples of comic romance, and this film made it all feel rather unimpressive.

The tone and visual aesthetic of the film definitely takes its cue from executive producer Christopher Nolan.  While nowhere near as gloomy and sinister as the Dark Knight Trilogy, Man of Steel has a certain somewhat melancholy and muted quality that has not been seen in the other films in the Superman franchise.  At times this makes it difficult to believe in the hope the film tries so desperately to convey.  The one place this visual does work is in the death of Krypton.  Watching the end of Superman’s home planet is truly heartbreaking, leaving me with a “there but for the grace of god” feeling.  The destruction of Superman’s home planet is caused solely by the actions and inactions of its citizenry.  It’s not too difficult to envision humanity reaching this same point if we are unwilling to stop thinking only of ourselves and our own immediate gain.  The obvious hints at current events (some of which were only imagined at the time of filming) only make the message more poignant.

Director Zach Snyder once again brings his own particular visual style to the screen which balances Nolan’s darker tone beautifully.  Although I enjoyed Watchmen and Sucker Punch, they were both overwhelming at times.  Man of Steel kept much of the same feel without the stimulus overload.  The generous, though not indulgent, use of this aesthetic is brilliant.  The best of these scenes was the conversation between Zod and Clark that takes place entirely in Clark’s head.  Quickly shifting settings and costumes provides a dramatic element in what would otherwise just be a boring, clichéd villain monologue.

The plot of Man of Steel revolves around the all too familiar origin of Superman, which at this point has been told and retold countless times.  However, this is one of the best that I’ve ever seen; just short of Grant Morrison’s All-Star Superman.  The decision to use General Zod as the villain, instead of the old fall back Lex Luthor (yes, I saw the Lex-Corp signs; nice touch), was inspired.  Luthor, although Superman’s arch-nemesis, is a mere mortal man; not a believable threat to the near demi-god that is the Man of Steel.  Zod, on the other hand, presents a threat that is physically equal to Superman and considerably more experienced.

What I enjoyed most about Man of Steel is the little details.  I loved the total beating that Superman takes at the hands of his fellow Kryptonians.  Throughout his life, Clark has been forced to be a pacifist because of his abilities.  While this eventually makes him the hero we know and love, it also means that until this point he has never been in a real fight.  While Clark manages to hold his own because he has already adapted to Earth’s environment, it is obvious that the professional soldiers squaring off against him have a considerable advantage from experience.

This leads me to watching young Clark acclimating to his powers and then later watching the newly arrived Kyptonians’ laborious on the fly adaptation.  When Clark’s powers first manifested he was hardly able to control them and it took him many years to reach the level of mastery we see him demonstrate in the beginning of the film.  The Phantom Zone prisoners however did not have this lifetime of practice with which to master their newfound powers.  They were forced to adapt on a significantly advanced learning curve.  The progression of Clark’s mastery of his power was made more believable by the Kryptonians’ struggle.  The Kryptonians can’t even fly for most of the movie; instead they are forced to leap tall buildings in a single bound.

Since this is a reboot of the Superman film franchise, there were obviously some changes made to the story to make it more relevant to modern audiences and to purge stuff that didn’t make sense or served no real purpose, and I was totally cool with them.  Although it has been a part of the costume since the beginning, I’ve never been a big fan of the red trunks (or red briefs) on the outside of the costume.  I shed no tears for their departure from the Superman mythos.

One change that did disappoint me a bit was the death of Jonathan Kent.  This is one of the pivotal events in the life of Clark Kent; often the one which ultimately leads to him to become Superman. Traditionally Clark’s father dies of a heart attack, something that Clark is powerless to prevent.  In the updated version however, Kent dies in a tornado, refusing to allow Clark to save him for fear of exposing his son’s abilities.  It makes the scene much more touching—the idea of yet another father sacrificing himself for Clark’s sake—but I think something is lost in the change.  In the previous films, Kent’s death reminded the audience that even with his almost god-like powers, Superman is not omnipotent.  Such a deep, personal loss gave us a sense of his humanity.

The majority of the movie was fairly predictable, but for me, the end is where things came apart, all in one rather awful scene: Superman is forced to kill Zod to prevent him from killing more innocent people.  I understand that from the standpoint of a non-fanboy this may have worked and even seemed to be a right choice, but all I could feel was vast disappointment.  I am aware that the Superman of the comics has killed before, when the need has arisen, and that this isn’t that same Superman with seventy-five years of canon to support him.  However, Superman is meant to inspire us to be better than we are; to appeal to those things that are best in humanity.  Being that example means showing mercy.  It means believing that someone can change, even if it comes with the risk that they fall back on their old ways.  There is something decidedly wrong in a comic universe where Superman kills Zod while Batman allows Joker to live.  Certainly both deserve death, and the chance for reforming either is almost non-existent, but that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be tried.  Maybe I can’t explain why it is okay for Superman to kill Nazis in the ‘40’s but it is not okay for him to kill Zod in 2013, but I do know that it represents a failing of Superman as an ideal.  In killing Zod, for that brief moment, Superman no longer represents what we should all strive to be, but instead shows us the worst that humanity has to offer.  And while maybe necessary, it is still a terrible waste.  To me this plot twist demonstrated a lack of understanding of the character.

Although the ending left a bad taste in my mouth, I, like Superman himself, am hopeful.  There were some absolutely incredible moments in this film that have the potential to make this reboot of Superman everything Geekdom hopes and wants it to be.  With a thoughtful tone and solid cast, this chapter of Man of Steel could finally have the magic that elevates DC films to the next level.  This movie would have gotten a solid 3.5, maybe even 4 Death Stars, but with such a dramatic wrong turn at the ending, I just can’t bring myself to give it any more than 2.5 Death Stars.  I look forward to the next installment of this new franchise with hope!

2.5 Death Stars

Leave a comment

Filed under Andrew Hales, Movie Reviews, Movies