Category Archives: Reviews

Editorial | Review: The Wolverine

While the fearless leader of Therefore I Geek has pretty much given a flawless review of The Wolverine, there are some things I wanted to point out in the movie.

First of all, I must say that I have always been a big fan of the star-crossed love story of Jean Grey and Wolverine. Jean may have loved Scott Sommers, but she shared a special part of her heart, and a psychological connection that transcended even her death, with Logan. While her appearance in The Wolverine might have been confusing to someone new to the X-Men movies, it resonated with die-hard fans, I think.

20130730-173437.jpg
However, having said how much I enjoyed seen Jean again, I must also point out that Mariko is, to paraphrase one of the above mentioned diehard fans, “Wolverine’s greatest love.” It seems like an odd decision to lessen the impact of her arrival on the Wolverine movie timeline by continuing to show Logan’s flashbacks to his deceased flame whose consciousness may or may not still be around.

Speaking of Mariko, a study of Wolverine’s behavior would seem to show that, given a choice of two attractive Japanese girls, he would choose to love the bad ass one, not the one that didn’t know how to fend for herself.

Finally, I would like to point out that superheating a blade does not increase its cutting power. In fact, if adamantium were heated to the point that it could cut through adamantium, it would be melting on itself. Fail.

20130730-173811.jpg
Overall, I walked out of the theater feeling unimpressed. These plot points coupled with a ridiculous amount of handcam for action sequences, and an overly dark palette of colors force me to give this move just three out of five Death Stars.

3 Death Stars

[I DID however squeal ever so slightly over the X-Men: Days of Future Past trailer at the beginning of the movie. Well done, movie creators!]

Leave a comment

Filed under Editorial, Movie Reviews, Movies, Tracy Gronewold

Review: The Wolverine

the_wolverine_teaser_one-sheet

“I’m Wolverine. I’m the best at what I do, but what I do isn’t very nice”.  Ok, so that quote isn’t in The Wolverine, but it has always been true.  This movie is no exception.  The Wolverine provides plenty of high energy action as well as some nice quiet moments which are used to explore the thoughts going on inside Logan’s head.  All said and done this was a fun summer action movie, but while certainly better than X-Men Origins: Wolverine there was still some room for improvement.

Prior to seeing the film on Friday night, I had intentionally avoided reading or watching almost anything about the film as much as possible.  While parts of X-Men Origins: Wolverine were good, overall I was not impressed and I wanted to come into this film with as clean a slate as I could.  This meant that until about fifteen minutes into the movie I wasn’t quite sure where in the X-Men film timeline this film took place.  This is not necessarily a bad thing, but I had assumed it would be a direct sequel to the first Wolverine movie.  Instead it takes place sometime after the events of X-Men: The Last Stand.

After an opening flashback sequence, we find Logan living on the fringes of society, sleeping in the woods, haunted by nightmares of things he’s done.  A quick few scenes occur in Wolverine’s native Canada and then viewers are off to Japan, where the real story begins.  This story taps into material from the Frank Miller Wolverine mini-series as well as the first story arc of the Wolverine on-going series that followed.

The first thing I’d like to mention is that they fixed the biggest problem I had with the last movie:  the CGI claws. For whatever reason, in several scenes of the previous Wolverine movie, the CGI claws look incredibly low budget and just plain bad.  That was not the case this time around. I don’t know if it was due to better CGI or the possible increased use of physical claws, but it did the trick.

I had no issue with the plot.  I have only a passing knowledge of this particular portion of Wolverine comics, so the movie seemed to line up well enough with what I already knew.

Hugh Jackman’s portrayal of Wolverine is still fantastic.  He has a great understanding of the character and it appears that he truly enjoys putting on the claws and sideburns to become Wolverine.

Okamoto-Mariko

I think it’s a pretty good fit.

Playing Wolverine’s love interest, Mariko, was new comer Tao Okamoto.  I liked her performance, but it did seem as though she is new to film acting.  With a bit more time and experience I think she could do some interesting things.

Fellow model-turned-actress Rila Fukushima served as a sidekick of sorts to Wolverine and served well enough in the role, though her English was a bit choppy and that wore on me after a while.  Several of the other cast members looked familiar to me, but I couldn’t place them and had to look them up on IMDB.  Mariko’s father, Shingen, was played by Hiroyuki Sanada, who I knew as Kaneda in Sunshine, and Yashida, played by Hal Yamanouchi, had a small role in 2004’s The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou.

The phrase “big superhero movie” implies several things, chief among which is action. The Wolverine delivers on the action pretty consistently though the movie.  All actions movies have their peaks and valleys, but this one seemed to have many more of both. Shorter, more frequent periods of calm were punctuated by action sequences of varying length. Since the movie was rated PG-13, the amount of violence that could be shown was minimal, but it was still obvious that Wolverine is still the best at what he does—slashing and stabbing people.

Unfortunately, the action scenes lead me into what I didn’t like about the movie.  I cannot stand shaky camera work, and many of the action sequences were shot using this terrible technique. I understand that the idea is to try and convey a sense of movement and the chaos of a fight, but instead it just causes viewers confusion and really bad visuals. Some of these scenes would look so much better they didn’t feel like a Parkinson’s patient was holding the camera. On a positive note, the panoramic scenery shots were wonderful.  They really make me want to visit Australia, where the film was shot.

My other biggest complaint has to do with the considerable amount of prior knowledge necessary to really enjoy most of this film.  At various points in the movie, Logan dreams about Jean Grey.  Although I have always loved her character, her inclusion without any explanation made for some confusion.  I also felt that Jean’s presence in this movie was unnecessary. It’s not that I didn’t like the actress who played her or how they used her; I just think the movie would have been perfectly fine without her in it.

I would also like to point out that there were far too many secondary villains.  There were 5 different characters that I would classify as secondary villains, in addition to the final bad guy, the Silver Samurai. The only saving grace in this is that unlike Iron Man 2, which suffered from too many villains with separate plots running at the same time, all of Wolverine’s foes tied into a single interwoven plot.  viperAlso, the use of Viper as a secondary villain confused even me. I have a fair amount of Marvel Comics knowledge and I had to look her up when I got home. I’m sure there was another more prominent villain that they could have used.  I’m also unsure of her previous connections to Wolverine in the comic universe.

In both the comic and the movie universes Wolverine is a major fan favorite, and yet for some reason, these movies keep falling short of achieving their full potential. I have heard nothing about a potential sequel, and this weekend’s box office take makes me doubt the likelihood a bit, but the increase in quality makes me believe that a third movie could really be something special.  While I liked the movie, I wasn’t wowed by it and there were some considerable flaws that detracted from the overall enjoyment of the movie. Moreover, the amount of background knowledge needed makes this a difficult jumping on point for new movie goers.  I give The Wolverine 3 out of 5 Death Stars.

3 Death Stars

Leave a comment

Filed under Andrew Hales, Movie Reviews, Movies

Editorial | Review: Much Ado About Nothing

Angel fans, rejoice!!  Fred and Wesley have finally gotten their happily ever after!!!  Ok, not really—but I still felt a little twinge of rightness in the casting of Benedick and Beatrice in Joss Whedon’s Much Ado About Nothing.  Here’s the good, the bad, and the ugly of this film according to me.

image

Together at last!

The first scene made me instantly cringe and prepare for a long hour and a half—awkward speech and several actors deliberately not looking at the camera gave me that “indie” feeling—but the instant that Alexis Denisoff (Benedick) opened his mouth—the second scene he was in, for those counting—all anxiety fled.  This man was made for the boards!  His delivery was spot on, and his facial expressions and body language completely clarified any contextual issues in a form of English that is five centuries old.

Amy Acker sparkled as the witty, aggressive Beatrice.  It is a character that can easily appear abrasive, but that is not a word that can ever be applied to Acker.  The dynamic between these two characters completely overtakes the primary plotline, which is the rocky road to marriage for Claudio and Hero.

Whedon, unable to leave his mark on the script, instead brands his work with brilliant direction and non-speaking asides.  Notably, Beatrice mocks Benedick during an interlude by a fire pit, and repeatedly brushes away the amorous advances of the man sitting next to her with barely a thought; Leonato, worn out by a two day bender, falls asleep in the middle of Claudio’s formal request for his daughter’s hand, and is sharply woken by Beatrice; the watchmen, recast as Don Pedro’s private security, lock their keys in their car and become frantic.  Another brilliant move was in casting Conrade, henchman of Don John, as a woman.  This allowed for an interesting twist in their relationship (pun entirely intended), and made Don John appear even more depraved.

image

Because Nathan Fillion.

I occasionally felt that the dialogue could have been enunciated more clearly—several lines were lost in conversation—but considering how meticulous the Bard was about infusing his plays with tongue-twisters and puns, this is understandable.

The fact that the entire film is clearly a summer party and that it was filmed in the director’s own house, gives it a feeling of intimacy that is unusual for Shakespeare.  Ultimately, I left the theater feeling not as though I had just watched a Shakespearean play, but that I had just watched a group of funny, witty people carry out a party weekend in Elizabethan English.  Very funny, very witty people—and I want so badly to be friends with all of them.  Much Ado About Nothing is sweet, sexy, subtle, and smart. I highly recommend it.

“The play’s the thing…”  Yes it is, my dear Joss, yes it is.

Four out of five death stars.

4 Death Stars

Leave a comment

Filed under Editorial, Movie Reviews, Movies, Tracy Gronewold

Review: Much Ado About Nothing

Much_Ado_About_Nothing_one_sheet

We all know I’m a comic geek.  In addition to this however, I’m also a fan of Shakespeare.  I started reading the Bard’s works in fifth grade starting with Hamlet and Macbeth.  As I’ve gotten older, I’ve also come to really love modern interpretations of the plays.  Among my favorites are Scotland, PA and 10 Things I Hate About You, and now I’m quite happy to add Joss Whedon’s Much Ado About Nothing to that list.

Probably the most distinctive thing about a Joss Whedon movie is the script.  Anyone who is at all familiar with his work knows that his writing has a very specific feel that is immediately identifiable.  Joss’s choice to use the traditional Shakespearean script instantly removes his most notable trademark and raises a self-imposed challenge —one that Joss hurdles almost effortlessly.  Instead of adding his quirky sense of humor to the back and forth banter of the characters, Whedon leaves dialogue to the master and inserts himself into the direction of characters and the addition of small, non-speaking scenes.

It is obvious in several scenes that Whedon is providing very specific physical directions to actors to make best use of the existing dialogue and to enhance the scene through their performance.  Although I find Shakespearean comedies funny on their own, these new directions that Joss provides take this to a whole new level.

During one particular scene Benedick is listening in on a conversation between several other characters.  While it would be simple enough to have him hide behind a bush or something similar, Joss instead has Benedick doing all kinds of ridiculous things to hide including lying flat on his stomach in the grass while trying to use a rather inadequate tree branch as cover for his face. The other characters are obviously aware of what is going on, but ignore him and continue with their conversation. I have no idea how any of these actors were able to keep a straight face while these crazy antics were going on just behind them.

One of the non-speaking scenes that added to the film takes place between two of the security guards. Thanks to the many conversations we’ve witnessed between them, we are already well aware that they are not overly gifted in matters of the mind, however to further reinforce this impression, this little scene shows the two of them searching for their keys, only to realize they locked them in the car.  This scene is completely unnecessary but it adds so much to the characters. It allows for the quick glance deeper that Whedon is known for, without saying a word.

security

Nathan Fillion would like it known that he is an ass.

I would be remiss if I failed to mention the casting of this film.  Made up of many Whedon alumni, the cast works just as it should.  Unlike Shakespearean tragedies, the comedies feel more like an ensemble.  Despite having plenty of recognizable faces in the cast, there are no divas, and no true standouts.  This is not to say that none of the cast stood out, but more to say that the cast as a whole was amazing.  While I have no doubts there were several outtakes due to dialogue, I can’t remember any points in the film where the sometimes difficult Shakespearean English tripped up the actors.  It was all delivered cleanly and in a manner which helped make the often muddy much clearer.

I think the most telling thing for me is that I have almost nothing negative to say about this film.  Although I did have a moment of trepidation at the very beginning due to the seemingly stereotypical “indie film” opening scene, this was cleared up within another minute.  There were one or two times that I didn’t care much for the way a particular camera angle was used or that the music may have been a bit too menacing, but this was all so minor that it didn’t take away from the film as a whole.  Let’s be honest, if all I can find to complain about is a couple of camera shots and a minute or so of music, this is definitely a home run and damn near a grand slam.  Whether you are a fan of the Bard, of Mr. Whedon, or both, this film is definitely worth checking out. I already have plans to add it to my Blu-Ray collection.

5/5 Death Stars

5/5 Death Stars

2 Comments

Filed under Andrew Hales, Movie Reviews, Movies