Category Archives: Tracy Gronewold

Editorial |The Silent Character

In the course of writing a novel or a screenplay, authors carefully set up the scene they wish to play out.  In science fiction or fantasy—even more so than in other genres—they create a world, and then populate it with figures that are limited only by the author’s imagination.  However, I submit that in the very best sort of books there is one character that is not created by the author, but is temporarily bound in the world he creates:  the reader.

A book is something like the stage on which a play is performed.  The onlooker sees everything that is going on in the story spread out before him in his mind’s eye.  In a play, the characters can interact with themselves, but they arrange themselves to be visible to the audience as much as possible.  Their gestures are larger than life, their facial expressions more dramatic, and their voices pitched to carry to the unmentioned and usually silent viewers.  Although in most plays the actors never acknowledge the audience, they still consider its response in every action that takes place on stage.

In a good book, the kind that sucks the reader in and completely absorbs him, the same thing happens.  In most of these books, such as Tolkien’s The Hobbit (now a Major Motion Picture), the reader is never directly addressed.  Characters act, interact, and react with each other for the benefit of the audience.  Events are arranged for thrilling suspense.  Action sequences are highlighted, and periods in between them are foreshortened.

Sometimes, although more rarely, the author does directly speak to his readers.  This is usually an aside.  My favorite example of this is from C. S. Lewis in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, “”Wherever is this?” said Peter’s voice, sounding tired and pale in the darkness. (I hope you know what I mean by a voice sounding pale.)”  I think I was six years old the first time I read this, and it was a completely novel idea to me (pun entirely intended) to be addressed by an author I already loved and trusted by this point in the book.  However, this style of writing does not happen very often.

Down the beaver hole

Some authors spend more time crafting the story to their audience, such as Piers Anthony.  His world of Xanth is escapist fantasy taken to extremes.  Nearly everything in this fictional universe is designed to be a pun or an inside joke.  The reader is fully engaged as a silent character in his world.  More serious authors tend to make the role of the reader much smaller.  However, even these authors expect the audience to be fully engaged in the story.

In some cases, the author starts off with a good sense of his audience as a silent participant in his world, but then seems to forget their presence, further into the story.  A great example of this is George R. R. Martin’s Song of Ice and Fire series.  The first couple of books read like smooth and beautiful stage productions.  The level of description sets the stage for the reader, without becoming so boring that he skips over large sections.  The action flows at a fluctuating pace:  slowing down during the moments of action and speeding up to skip over slow, boring chains of events, such as Catelyn Stark’s journey to King’s Landing in A Game of Thrones.  In later books, such as A Dance With Dragons, Martin seems to prefer spelling out each and every tiny event, even if it has very little to do with the story.  In cases such as this, I personally feel that extra time in the editing stage of the process is necessary.  (Of course, he doesn’t really have the time for extended editing sessions, but I digress.)

If GRRM doesn’t get the next book out sometime next year… grrmmph mumble mumble…

It seems obvious, then, that the audience to any good story is a silent, third party character which interacts with the world and the characters in it.  When the reader is so enthralled with a book that he or she spends hours or even days after it is closed reliving the events in his imagination, or creating new stories set on the same stage, the author has done his job.

Have you read a book that kept you focused for days, and even made you unwilling to read something else for a little while after you finished it?  Let us know in the comments.  I may even add it to my Reading List of Doom!

1 Comment

Filed under Books, Editorial, Tracy Gronewold

Editorial | Editing 101: “How to… Avoid Pissing off the Writer”

As an editor, one of the scariest things I have to do is… edit someone else’s work.  It may sound odd, because it is my job, but it is the truth.  As an editor, I’m responsible for taking the brain child of another human being, and making just enough changes so that readers can understand it, while making sure the author’s voice is never lost.

A large part of the fear comes from the fact that telling another person that their work needs improvement is never easy for either party.  It is important that I as an editor point out the flaws in writing as gently as possible.  At the same time, it is always hard for anyone to accept criticism without taking it too personally.

First of all, it is important that an editor and a writer have a good working relationship.  It is a bonus if they have a solid friendship.  Often when two stubborn people bump heads over the correct word to use in a sentence—and believe me, both writers and editors are inherently stubborn; it’s in their genetics—only a healthy relationship will allow them to back away from the situation.  This relationship also allows them to see each other as humans, and not just the faceless creator or modifier of words on a page.  Often, this relationship (and sometimes a significant distance between them) is all that will keep an editor from killing her blog writer.  Not that I speak from personal experience, of course.

Secondly, as an editor, it is important to have respect for the person whose work is being edited.  I have found that when I personally respect the person whose writing I am editing, I am much more likely to be cautious in how I approach changes.

I never tell a writer that their ideas are stupid.  As far as I am concerned, every idea is excellent—it is sometimes merely a diamond in the rough.  It may require a little cut and polish to truly shine.  Instead I find ways to point out how their ideas can be improved, or that their particular audience may not be the most appreciative of a piece of writing.

I keep my words respectful as well.  Sometimes just the choice of language in discussing someone’s work is the difference between making them angry, and actually getting a fantastic final piece of writing.

Lastly, and I have mentioned this before, it is incredibly important to retain the author’s voice in his piece.  If I think that a sentence or paragraph is awkward or unclear, I usually will just say as much to the author, and allow him or her to rewrite it in the way that seems best.  If they prefer that I give them suggestions, then I do so, but in a style as close to theirs as I can write.  This is much easier if I do have a good working relationship or a friendship with the person.

Being a good editor comes down to the attitude with which I handle the person writing the piece.  To make sure that I don’t piss off the writer, I try to establish a good relationship with him, hold him and his work in regard, and I do my best to preserve his voice within his work.

Have you ever worked with someone that you pissed off too badly to continue working together?  Let us know in the comments.

Leave a comment

Filed under Editing 101, Editorial, Tracy Gronewold

Editorial | When Geek Life Interferes with Real Life

Sooo it is finals week for me, as well as most university students in the United States.  While this is a delightful time for most adults, involving frolicking in virgin snowfall and rushing about in scarves and knit caps, carrying armfuls of packages wrapped in brown paper, for me it mostly involves rushing from one group study meeting to another, and dozing off over study guides.

However, there is one glitch to this idyllic vision of the devoted college student:  I’m a geek.  Sometimes, being a geek interferes with my real life.  For instance, this afternoon I was happily typing away at a bullet-point riddled evaluation of Walzer’s application of just war theory to modern obliteration bombing, when suddenly without my consent, my mouse directed my browser to open a new tab to find out when the new season of Sherlock would air in the US.  (It is January 19th on PBS, if anyone is interested.)  Twenty minutes later, I realized that not only was my study guide not finished, but I was late to a group study meeting. ARGH!!

I feel that Sherlock might have had some excellent insight into the Melian’s dilemma…

Then there was the moment while I, engrossed in determining whether climate change or nuclear weapons in terrorist hands were the greater threat to international security, was interrupted by a message from one of my friends who wished to debate the merits of Fox Mulder as an FBI agent.  I have some very strong opinions on this subject, so of course, there was another hour down the drain.

In order to combat the tendency to lose time in this way, I recently decided to create an incentive system for focusing on schoolwork. I spent an hour writing outlines, and then decided to reward myself with an episode of Supernatural.  Four episodes later, I suddenly realized it was two o’clock in the morning and that I was going to be exhausted in class.

My evening hours seem especially prone to such distractions.  I’ve lost countless hours to A Song of Ice and Fire, or Atomic Robo.  About the only thing that doesn’t waste much of my time is video games—mostly because my lack of coordination causes me to get frustrated and give up long before time becomes an issue.

He’s a TERRIBLE criminal investigator… and I can prove it!!

Geek life spills over into my real life in other ways, too, and it doesn’t translate well either.  My meme references seem to always elicit strange, uncomprehending looks from those around me.  (Currently my favorite is Doge—because the final “wow” always, always makes me laugh out loud.)  Random references to my father, Mr. Maximoff, go unnoticed.  It is a sad, hard life.

Still, I manage to find a balance between surviving in the real world and enjoying my own geekiness.  First of all, I find other geeks who are available to hang out IRL.  Andrew, who writes most of this blog, is always down for a cup of coffee and a trip to one of the local comic book shops.  I have other geeky friends on campus who share my love of crime dramas, comic books, and fantasy.  Some even understand my meme references!!  At the same time, I’ve learned exactly how far I can push the procrastination button.  Sure I can binge on Grimm, X-Files, or Dr. Who sometimes,  but if there is a fifteen page paper due in two days, or it’s 3:00 a.m. and I have class in three hours, I have learned to put my entertainment aside and make sure I take care of my real life responsibilities.

Does your geek life ever spill over into your real life?  How does it happen for you?

1 Comment

Filed under Editorial, Geek Life, Tracy Gronewold

Editorial | 5 Reasons Supernatural is a Terrible TV Show

When I’m reading, I definitely prefer fantasy as a genre over science fiction.  Sci-fi has so many descriptions of strange species and technology, that I often feel that the story has been engulfed and overwhelmed.  However, when it comes to the screen—big or silver—sci-fi is much preferred to fantasy.  Still, not all sci-fi shows are created equal.  Let’s be honest, there are good sci-fi shows, and there are bad sci-fi shows, just as with any genre.  In fact, I think the following ratio sums it up nicely:

Supernatural/Grimm = Psych/NCIS

Without further ado, here are five reasons that Supernatural is a terrible show:

Is that a stack of credit card applications, or are you just happy to see me?

1.)         For people who commit credit card fraud for daily expenditures, Dean and Sam appear to never fill out credit card application forms.  Considering the heightened awareness of credit card fraud in the past decade or so, it seems as though they should be going through these things pretty quickly.  What address are they putting down for these cards?  How has no one noticed what has to be thousands of dollars in gas being fraudulently purchased?  In fact, my bank calls me to confirm that I actually am on a trip, if my card is used outside the state of the address I have given them.  Something seems fishy in the state of Denmark, Hamlet.

2.)         The demons that the Winchesters fight seem pretty impotent… until they’re not.  Simply repeating over and over how big and bad a character is doesn’t make that character actually big and bad. (The Yellow-Eyed Demon, Lilith, Eve…)

Just a little too pretty to be very scary.

3.)         There are no actual consequences to any of the brothers’ actions.  Somehow these boys have (allegedly) perpetrated every felony in the book, and yet no one seems to be able to catch and hold them to pay for these crimes.

4.)         Let’s not forget the multiple deals with multiple demons that they’ve made for one life or another.  Sam was revived by a covenant that traded Dean’s soul to the Cross-Roads Demon, which was later revoked.  Bobby almost lost everything to a card shark who played for time instead of money.  Dean was saved multiple times, including from the same card shark.  The only person who has actually paid the price for one of these deals seems to be the boys’ father.

5.)         There are no good and bad guys.  Sam and Dean eventually turn out to be selfish and petty enough to warrant plenty of head-slapping.  Demons turn out to sometime have good motives, and angels often have bad ones.  In a show about good versus evil, there seem to be no actually good or actually evil characters.

Are these actually good guys?

I’m a fan of Supernatural and I’ll support pretty much any sci-fi show on television, but the truth is that Supernatural is sci-fi “trash TV.”  I’ll keep watching my favorite guilty pleasure, but don’t expect me not to complain about it.

**This article has been UPDATED and a newer version can be found here.

1 Comment

Filed under Editorial, Tracy Gronewold