Monthly Archives: January 2014

Editorial | Sherlock, “The Empty Hearse” Reactions & Recap *spoilers*

***** SPOILER ALERT *****

This review will be discussing plot points which may be considered spoilers. Consider yourselves warned.

This is not a review of the first episode of Sherlock season three, “The Empty Hearse.”  No, the season premier has left me with the warm glow of satisfaction that usually accompanies post-coital cuddling.  I’m reduced to a mere reaction, rather than review.

So… Sherlock Holmes isn’t dead.  We already knew that, since British television apparently has not fallen into the silly trap of creating a season’s end cliffhanger for no reason other than to frustrate fans.  It was still better to have the mini webisode that appeared several weeks ago, “Many Happy Returns,” which showed us Anderson—now fired as coroner and obsessed with clues of Sherlock’s whereabouts—Lestrade, and Watson all receiving premonitions and oracles that seemed to tell them that Sherlock was indeed alive.

It is well known among my friends that I dislike most female characters.  I usually find them weak, catty, and foolish.  As a reader of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, I knew that Watson would eventually find his future wife and I fully expected to hate her.  Instead, Sherlock’s creators have given us Mary, played by Amanda Abbington (Martin Freeman’s wife IRL).  I enjoyed her performance and I already adore her depiction of Watson’s significant other.

As for Sherlock…  I cried when he met Watson.  I cried when he met Lestrade.  I laughed when he met Mrs. Hudson.  I can be incredibly critical of television shows that have poorly developed characters and inconsistent plotlines, but these characters get to me in a way that I have rarely felt.  I could feel the pain that both Watson and Mrs. Hudson went through, and I could feel how it simultaneously pulled them together and pushed them apart.

Molly is now engaged to someone who looks just like Sherlock.  I don’t want to like her character or be sympathetic to her plight, but I cannot help but feel sorry for her.  The look on her face when she tells Lestrade that she has moved on from Sherlock pleads for someone to believe her words so that she can believe them herself.

I appreciate the use of romantic tropes as metaphors for the relationship between Sherlock and John.  Again I am surprised at how much this amuses me, since I would normally find this humor pedantic and trite.

I loved the pat exchange between Mycroft and Sherlock Holmes regarding the Icelandic hat and the profile of its owner.  It really highlighted for the first time in this show how much alike they are in thought process and intellect.  They are very much brothers.  At the same time, their parents… what to say about their parents?  I honestly did not think we would ever see the elder Mr. and Mrs. Holmes.  To have them appear and seem so normal was rather disconcerting.

I must say that the situation in which John Watson is thrown into on Guy Fawkes day was confusing.  The motorcycle sequence as Sherlock and Mary rush to his rescue was wildly unbelievable and that entire section of plot left me confused.  However, I am learning to have faith in the show’s creators that all of this will make sense in time.  Instead of a pathetic device to move the plot forward, it will most likely turn out to be incredibly important to the rest of the season’s storyline.

Finally, the beautiful and convincing act that Sherlock uses to finally get John to admit to missing him and forgiving him was disturbingly realistic.  I honestly did believe Sherlock (foolish I know) when he said that he had no idea how to disarm the bomb.  My feeble brain thought that John would come up with a way to save Parliament in a shocking plot twist.  Apparently John Watson and I are equally gullible.

This has been a recounting of my reactions to the fantastic first episode of Sherlock just as I felt them.  Post your own reactions in the comments!  (Please avoid spoiling episodes two and three if you’ve already seen them.)  Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to rewatch it and make sure there isn’t anything I missed!

Leave a comment

Filed under Editorial, Television, Tracy Gronewold

Oscar Picks: A Conversation

The list of nominations for the 2014 Academy Awards was released yesterday, so Andrew and I decided to make it into a game.  We originally thought about gambling for pennies, but have now come up with a ridiculously complex system of points by which one of us will be named the winner (ok, it isn’t that complex).  Below is a transcript of our Oscar conversation, slightly edited for content and brevity. -t

Best Actor Leading Role

A. Christian Bale, because of his epic beer gut that is on display in several scenes.  It’s disturbing but Oscar worthy

T. Chiwetel Ejiofor for 12 Years a Slave.  Oscars eat that stuff up.  (I’m also really excited to see an actor from Serenity nominated for anything at all!)

His beer belly has a personality all its own.

Actor in Supporting Role

A. Jonah Hill.  The Wolf of Wall Street as a whole is sooo crazy.  The potential for him to walk with the Oscar is high

T. Jared Leto because he’s a rock star!

Actress in a Leading Role

A. Sandra Bullock because of the torture she put herself through for that movie.

T. Meryl Streep.  The line about Julia Roberts looking like a lesbian was hilarious to me.  Apparently, she also has the record for most Academy Award Nominations.

Actress in a Supporting Role

A. Jennifer Lawrence.  She doesn’t deserve it, but she will get it.

T. Jennifer Lawrence.  For the same reason, but I’m mad that Andrew said it first.

But she IS smoking hot.

Animated Feature Films

A. Despicable Me 2.  It wasn’t amazing, but of the choices, it was the funniest.  Minions:  that’s all that needs to be said.

T. The Wind Rises.  Miyazaki said that this will be his last film and I think the Oscars will want this brilliant creator to go out with a bang.

Cinematography

A. Gravity.  As crazy as that movie was, it has to be Gravity.

T. Gravity.  It was beautiful and there was little action to take away from the gorgeous shots of space.

Costume Design

A. American Hustle—not for the lack of bras, but because of the god-awful vintage clothes and decor that made me think, “Oh no!  Oh god, this WAS the seventies.”

T. The Great Gatsby.  The costumes were absolutely stunning, over-the-top, and larger than life (sorry for the redundancy).  I absolutely loved the clothing.

Directing

A. 12 Years a Slave.  If this guy wins, he’ll be the first African American to win best director, and with Scorsese being out of the picture (no pun intended) on Oscar principle, I think this is an opportunity too good for the Awards to pass up.

T. I’m going to go with American Hustle for this.  I think that the Oscars want to give this movie a top honor, but I think other movies will beat it out in other categories.

Steve McQueen (far right) would be the first African American director to win an Academy Award.

Documentary Feature

A. 20 Feet From Stardom, because I want to know what the hell “nominees to be determined” means.  Do we not know who made the movie?  Did we not watch the movie, but we’re voting on it?  Were there only five documentaries this year and all five were nominated?

T. The Act of Killing.  I don’t know why, but I’m drawn to that name.

Documentary Shorts

A. Prison Terminal, because the magic eight ball said so

T. Facing Fear, because the Oscars love anything by a Cohen

Film Editing

A. Gravity

T.  I’m going with Gravity also.  Andrew, stop stealing my picks.

Foreign Language Film

A. The Missing Picture, because I was unaware that Cambodia was making movies.  I’m glad to see they’ve moved beyond killing, but this is still a disturbing development.

T.  I don’t see any French movies.  How am I supposed to pick if there isn’t a French movie?  I guess I’ll go with Italy.  Which movie was made in Italy?  Oh, The Great Beauty.  Of course.

No punchline necessary.

**We considered for a while, and decided not to recognize or NOT recognize Palestine as a country.  Therefore I Geek will take a stance on many things, but the Middle East peace process is not one of them.

Makeup and Hair-Styling

A. Really?  Only three in this category?  Fine.  Since they half-assed it, so will I.  I’m going with Jackass.

T. The Lone Ranger, because it required more makeup on Johnny Depp alone than in the other two nominees combined.

Music (original score)

A. John Williams for The Book Thief.  It’s always classical music from him.  No way to go wrong with that.

T. Thomas Newman, Saving Mr. Banks.  I even commented on the score after I got out of the movie.  It was perfectly matched to the mood onscreen.

Music (original song)

A. “Happy” from Despicable Me 2 because I’ve seen the movie.  I don’t actually remember the song, though.

T. I haven’t seen Despicable Me 2, but I did hear the song “Happy” and I really like it.  So I’m going with that one.

Best Picture

A. I refuse to vote for Nebraska, because when it came out every other interview on NPR was about the movie, and I was tired of it before it even hit theaters.  I’m going with 12 Years a Slave.  It’s been making a lot of waves

T. How in the world is Megan Ellison nominated as a producer twice?  She produced American Hustle AND Her.  She basically has twice the likelihood of winning.  Just for that, I’m going with 12 Years a Slave.

Production Design

A. Great Gatsby.  They nailed that art deco.

T. Great Gatsby.  I saw the work they had to do behind the scenes… Everything was on green screen; it was phenomenal.

The top is the final scene; the bottom is the same scene before CGI.

Short Film (animated)

**We considered taking a break at this point and watching all the short films, but after realizing that they probably aren’t that short and also that it might take us a couple of days to find them, we changed our minds.

A. I’m voting for Get a Horse! because it is an imperative sentence.

T. Room on the Broom, because you know exactly what it is about from the title.  The whole plot is spelled out in that phrase.

**We lost our place at this point and completely skipped the next category… but it wouldn’t have mattered anyway since neither of us have seen any of the nominated films.  Obviously, we came back to it later.

Short Film (live action)

A.  I vote for the completely unpronounceable one because I want to see them try to pronounce it; especially if it’s a particularly stupid presenter.

T.  While I applaud Andrew’s solid method of choosing a candidate, I’m going to pick Helium, because in my head it is about a very annoying young child whose mother gives him too many balloons at a fair and he floats away, never to be seen again.

Sound Editing

A. I want to know what the difference is between sound editing and sound mixing…  I’m just gonna say The Hobbit because I don’t care anymore.

T.  I think that I will pick The Hobbit for one of these sound ones and Lone Survivor for the other one.  Heads for The Hobbit, tails for Lone Survivor. (Andrew flips)  He says it’s heads, so The Hobbit.

Sound Mixing

A. I’m still going with The Hobbit.

T.  Well, The Hobbit was my pick for sound editing, so I’m going with Lone Survivor.

Visual Effects

A. I’m going with Iron Man 3.  Three words, “House Party Protocol.”

T. I think at this point I’ve forgotten to pick things that I think will win and am now picking movies that I hope will win.  I hope Iron Man 3 gets SOMETHING from the Oscars, so let’s go with that one.

House Party Protocol.

House Party Protocol.

Writing (adapted screenplay)

A. Before Midnight.  I didn’t see it, but Richard Linklater did a fantastic job with A Scanner Darkly.

T.  The Wolf of Wall Street, because I think this is the only award they can give that movie without any fear that Martin Scorsese might appear to have been awarded in any way whatsoever.

Writing (original screenplay)

A.  American Hustle.

T.  I considered Blue Jasmine because of Woody Allen, but the Awards love to encourage indie films in this category and the closest thing to indie that has been nominated is Her.

**The Academy Awards will air on March 2, so stay tuned and see who wins our little Oscar pool (and the comentary that will ensue).

1 Comment

Filed under Andrew Hales, Geek Life, Movies

Around the Web January 16, 2014

On more than one occasion we’ve talked about how great digital comics are and apparently we are not the only ones who think so. Comixology is the (non-game) iPad app with the highest profit for 2013. In the last seven years Comixology has sold 6 billion pages worth of comics, 4 billion of those were sold just in the last year. Assuming an average paper thickness of .1mm, if last year’s sales were physical comics, they would be a stack of paper that reaches from New York City to Washington DC. Thankfully for the trees, these were digital sales.

20131108-comixology_logo

It is also interesting to note that many people who bought their first comic online have also started buying print comics as well.

Comics Alliance has a great piece about a new series called Nova Phase.  After reading this article, I went ahead and picked up the first two issues on Comixology (both released 1/15) and they were fantastic. It’s a familiar mix of science fiction and westerns much like Firefly, but of course it has little, wonderful touches that makes it feel unique. The art is fun and reminiscent of 8-bit style–though with more than eight colors–and it takes me to a happy place.  As someone who was raised on NES and SNES games, I think this is a well designed bit of retro that doesn’t allow itself to be handicapped by its limitations.

I want one!

I want one!

There is a great varient cover that I’d love to get my hands on, so if anyone knows where I might be able to find it, I’d be a very happy man.

It is no secret that Nintendo has been having issues with its Wii U console. One of the biggest reasons for this is the startling lack of third party game support. As it turns out a lot of this lack of support is Nintendo’s own fault.  A senior designer for one of the third party developers discussed many of the problems they encountered which included an underpowered prototype CPU, language barriers and Nintendo’s impressive lack of knowledge and experience with online game play. Designers were forced to jury rig computers to mimic the Wii U’s lackluster processor.  It takes a week or more to find solutions to issues that arise, and these are still more often confusing than helpful.

Not winning any awards as a developer's best friend.

Not winning any awards as a developer’s best friend.

While I do own a Wii U, I only use it for vintage games and I am unimpressed with the system as a whole. Maybe I was doing something wrong, but I couldn’t even get it to play a DVD.

Finally, A Tolkienist’s Perspective gives us an insightful look at some of Tolkien’s lesser known works. I think we’re all familiar with The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit but many people don’t know about his shorter stories. Personally, I only knew of one of these works (Farmer Giles of Ham), but now I’m going to be adding the others to my reading list. A Tolkienist’s Perspective provides context for these stories without giving away all of the delightful details that are Tolkien’s trademark.

tales-from-the-perilous-realm-cover

I’m just glad that The Adventures of Tom Bombadil only contains two poems about Tom Bombadil. I really don’t like Tom.

4 Comments

Filed under Around the Web

Confessions of a Geek: Cinematic Influences, Part 2

obi_boga

Seeing moments like this on the big screen for the first time was amazing!

Much like Andrew, I enjoy movies as escapist entertainment.  I had a very sheltered childhood and didn’t get to watch a lot of movies.  We did not have a TV in our house, and I was never allowed to go to movie theaters.  (This has bemused many of my friends, especially because I don’t associate popcorn, or food in general, with watching movies).  As an adult, I’ve had to catch up on a lot of pop culture references that I just didn’t understand (for instance, I was an adult before I had seen a Disney animated  movie and I still haven’t seen all of them).  I also often don’t have the nostalgic love for poorly made, cult classic movies and shows.

 I’m a little more demanding about consistency and plot than many moviegoers, which drives my movie loving friends a little crazy.  However, there ARE cinematic influences on my life.  Here are a few of them.

  • Disney’s Treasure Island –this was one of the earliest movies that my siblings and I saw.  I was probably around nine or ten.  We reenacted the movie many times in our backyard, using a large cardboard box as a ship.  Our favorite character was Ben Gunn because of a goofy line, “Many’s the long night I’ve dreamed of cheese–toasted, mostly.”  We were too young (and not British enough) to know what toasted cheese was, of course.
  • Buffy the Vampire Slayer—if my mother only knew how many days I would ask to go down the block to spend the afternoon with my friend Alex and her dog… but we were really watching Buffy. That was the beginning of my love of Joss Whedon, although I didn’t know who he was at the time.
  • Pollyanna—this movie was influential not because of its content, but because in my house every movie was compared to it.  It was actually a very perky, overly bright movie about a little girl who was good all the time.  We kids were supposed to look up to Pollyanna as an example, but she was mostly just annoying.
  • NOT The Wizard of Oz—I put this movie in here because it was NOT actually an influence on me.  This was my mother’s favorite movie when she was a child, and she made the fatal mistake of introducing it to her children when they were teenagers.  Of course, we make snarky comments about how cheesy the movie was, which frustrated her quite a bit.
  • The Lord of the Rings—these were the first movies that I properly “geeked out” about.  The Fellowship of the Ring came out when I was fifteen years old.  By this time, even we had the internet, so I was able to follow the process and development of the movies with intense anticipation.  I will never forget sitting for over an hour waiting for our 54k dialup to load the official trailer so that we could watch it in all its glory.
  • Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith—was the first movie I ever saw in a real movie theater.  I was nineteen years old, and was living on my own.  A friend of mine found out that I had never actually been to the cinema and dragged me along.  I enjoyed the experience but thought (and still think) that it was far too loud.

Those are just a few of the movies and TV shows that have had some profound influence on my life.  Mine are more like milestones of development, but even so, they each mark a significant piece of my life.  What movies have influenced you?  Let me know in the comments! -t

1 Comment

Filed under Editorial, Geek Life, Movies, Tracy Gronewold