Tag Archives: Superman

DC’s New 52: How we got there

Just about two years ago, DC Comics decided it was time to shake things up. This was no surprise. A revolution had been coming for a while, but this time DC was starting over from issue #1 on everything in their universe. When they said everything, they meant everything, including titles that had been around since the beginning, such as Action Comics, Detective Comics, Superman and Batman. Previously these books were untouchable, the holy relics of the comic book industry, and to do something this radical to them was a risky undertaking to say the least. As we approach the two year mark of this experiment, I think it’s worth taking some time to look back and evaluate how each of the New 52 titles is doing. So each Thursday in September (and the last in August. I’m looking at you, Justice League) we’ll take a short look at those books that came out two years earlier.

New52logo1

Before we get into the books themselves, it’s probably a good idea to take a look even further back and see how DC got to the point of needing a completely clean slate. DC has a long and convoluted archive of continuity that has often been intimidating to new comic book readers trying to jump on. More than once DC has tried to pull off a universe-wide reboot, but it hasn’t always gone according to plan.

Back in 1985, DC came to the realization that fifty years of uncoordinated continuity had become too unwieldy. How could they explain to new readers that Golden Age Superman was old but alive and working with the Justice Society, while Silver Age Superman was young and a part of the Justice League? Were there two Supermans? The original attempt to explain things away was the Multiverse, an idea that many of these characters existed at the same time, but in parallel universes, each one with its own history. This worked for a while, but after time these different Earths began to cross over with an increasing frequency that once again made it difficult to keep things straight, and it was decided that something had to be done. Enter Crisis on Infinite Earths, a universe-spanning event comic that would radically alter the face of the DCU. By the end, whole swaths of characters had been removed from existence, the Multiverse was eliminated and a single Earth (with a single Superman) was left behind.

Though one of many characters killed during Crisis on Infinite Earths, Supergirl was probably the most popular character to meet her end.

Though one of many characters killed during Crisis on Infinite Earths, Supergirl was probably the most popular character to meet her end.

Because carving a Superman logo into your chest is completely normal

Because carving a Superman logo into your chest is completely normal

Soon, events and characters were referred to as Pre- and Post-Crisis and all was well. At least for a little while. Over the next several years, writers began to reintroduce characters and plot elements that had been wiped out in Crisis. What was originally a pretty clean restart slowly began to resemble the Pre-Crisis DCU with all of its twists and turns. Throughout all of this, though, the Multiverse stayed gone. With no Multiverse there was still a limit on how crazy plotlines could get because all the characters had to exist within the same universe. That all came crashing down when the Multiverse was brought back in Infinite Crisis. Following several lead-in mini-series, Infinite Crisis revealed that Golden Age Superman had not perished during Crisis on Infinite Earths, but had, in fact, gone into hiding with his wife Lois, Superboy Prime, and Alexander Luthor (Lex Luthor from a different Earth). When Lois’ health starts to fail, Superman determines that her health will improve if she is returned to her Earth, and they leave their hiding place and begin an attempt to replace the current Earth-1 with their Earth-2. Eventually Superboy Prime goes crazy and kills several heroes and villains, including his Earth-1 counterpart, Connor Kent. Superboy Prime is stopped, but not without causing both Supermans to be depowered and a considerable body count.

The fallout from Infinite Crisis was taken up by the breakthrough series 52. An ambitious concept, 52 released an issue a week for a full year. Even more shocking was that this series would not include DC’s holy trinity of Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman. This decision allowed writers to use lesser known heroes, relying on character development rather than just big names. The year started out with a series of stories which are interesting but mostly unrelated, but as the weeks passed the stories became more intertwined until it culminated with the reveal of the existence of fifty-two new parallel universes, created at the end of Infinite Crisis.

250px-Cover_52_Week_One_(May_10,_2006)

Now you may think “at least we’ve made it to the New 52”, but alas, you’d be wrong. Next, fans were made to suffer through Countdown to Final Crisis, a disasterous follow up to 52 which followed 52’s weekly release schedule, but lacked its overall appeal. The storytelling was questionable at best and it was populated by characters that most people didn’t really care about. Additionally, the plotlines became so skewed as the series progressed that by the time it ended they no longer lined up with Final Crisis. Subsequently most of the storylines were retroactively removed from continuity.

Thankfully Final Crisis turned out much better than its lead-in event. Written by DC’s powerhouse writers Grant Morrison and J.G. Jones, Final Crisis was a well written, if confusing story. Further tapping into lesser known characters, and adding more than a few of his own, Morrison made considerable use of Jack Kirby’s New Gods, most of whom had not seen much use in recent years. Additionally, the Multiverse played a major role in the Final Crisis with the inclusion of the Monitors, a whole race based on one of the key players from Crisis on Infinite Earths. While a great story, Final Crisis was anything but final and did little to help maintain the clean continuity that DC had attempted to setup all those years ago. And oh yeah, Batman died.

Are we starting to see a theme emerge?

Are we starting to see a theme emerge?

This being comics however, Batman came back (Turns out he was just trapped in the past. Happens to me all the time), just like many characters before him. While he was gone, however, readers were treated to Dick Grayson as Batman, as well as the DCU-spanning Green Lantern event, Blackest Night. As if things hadn’t been confusing enough, Blackest Night brought many dead heroes and their loved ones back to life as Black Lanterns (If your head wasn’t hurting before this, it should be right about now). While impressive for its cosmic scale, Blackest Night was a nightmare for those not intimately familiar with DC’s continuity.

I see dead people...a lot of them.

I see dead people…a lot of them.

The final stop on our journey to the New 52 is Flashpoint. The Flash (Barry Allen) wakes up in what he believes to be an alternate timeline in which Wonder Woman and Aquaman are at war with one another and Batman is Thomas Wayne, whose son Bruce was killed in Crime Alley. Eventually Barry finds out that he is not in an alternate timeline, but in his own timeline that has changed after he attempted to travel back in time to save his mother from dying. Barry is eventually forced to undo what he has done and in the process the DC universe merges with those of its imprints, Vertigo and Wildstorm, and the timeline resets, leaving us with the New 52.

This controlled reboot of the DCU was twenty-six years in the making and took several failed attempts to get right. Through the next five weeks, Therefore I Geek will explore the things DC has gotten thing right and point out areas in which they took a misstep or two. Each week we will discuss the first wave books that were released that week two years ago and see where they’ve been, what’s going on now, and where they are headed. Lucky for you, Week One only consists of one book, Justice League. Stand by for Weeks Two through Five and join us for a look at the state of the DCU.

6 Comments

Filed under Andrew Hales, Comic Reviews, Comics

Editorial | Review: Man of Steel

WARNING: THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS

Overall, I loved Man of Steel.  The visuals were stunning and the sound enhanced the overall feel.  It was nice to go to a movie and not be distracted by sound effects.  I hope that as a genre, comic book movies are moving past the era of ear shattering explosions and crashes.  Don’t get me wrong, I want to hear what is happening on the screen, but I like my eardrums intact.

Unlike others that have seen the movie, I did not have a problem with the final plot “twist.”  As a moviegoer, I found Superman’s decision to kill Zod quite satisfying, considering the fact that the villain had just destroyed an entire city and plotted to wipe out humanity.  The heavy, audible snap of Zod’s neck was a nice touch.

THINGS THAT MADE ME HAPPY BECAUSE THEY WERE MISSING:
  • That bizarre curl on his forehead
  • Crazy outfits and hair on the Kryptonians
  • “Truth, Justice, and the American way.”  [It’s time to retire that phrase]
THINGS THAT MADE ME HAPPY BECAUSE THEY EXISTED:
  • Jor-El.  Wow.  I was blown away.  Did NOT expect Russell Crowe to pull that one off.
  • Slightly crooked teeth and chest hair on Superman [He may be the perfect humanoid, but his physique is not humanly impossible—thank goodness!]
  • A haphazard ponytail with the ponytail holder showing on Lois Lane in the desert!!  This felt so natural and realistic.
  • FLAGS EVERYWHERE!!!!  It’s been a long time since I saw a movie that felt so patriotic.
  • Superman: “I grew up in Kansas.  I’m as American as they come.” [I felt this was a fitting adjustment to his normal catchphrase, see above]
MOMENTS THAT I LOVED:
  • Faora: “Is that what you want me to tell General Zod?  That you are uncooperative?”
    Col. Nathan Hardy: “I don’t care what you tell him.”
  • Superman destroys the surveillance drone, because he’s 100% American.  [I may or may not have fallen in love with him at that moment]
  • Gen. Swanwick: “Captain, why are you smiling?”
    Captain: “I just think he’s kinda hot.”
  • Jor-El: “My son is twice the man you were.”  [According to his DNA structure, isn’t he millions and millions the man Zod is?]
    jor el
PLOT POINTS THAT MADE NO SENSE:
  • Zod declares that either Superman dies or he dies… and then proceeds to remove his greatest strategic advantage by taking off his armor
  • Lois Lane is now one of two people responsible for dropping the “bomb” that will save all humanity.  [Really?!?!  We’re all ok with having a reporter completing a military operation???]
OTHER RANDOM THINGS:
  • Holy product placement, Superman!!!!  I saw Nikon, Ihop, Dodge, Sears, 7-Eleven, U-haul, and the Royals… it’s a drinking game just waiting to be played.
  • “You know what they say, it’s all downhill after the first kiss.”  [Really?  They say that? Pretty sure I’ve never heard that ever.]
  • First moments with both fathers felt campy and forced (Truck bed with Kevin Costner after the bus incident and on the spaceship with Jor-El telling him his history).
  • Also the history sequence was weird and included things that happened at Jor-El’s death.  How did it get programmed onto the drive?
  • The spaceship design was disappointing.  My guess is that artists are trying to make them look like they are of elemental alloys not found on Earth, meaning they must be denser than anything here, but they just look like they’re carved of stone.  There are a million geniuses in Hollywood; surely SOMEONE can come up with a new design.
  • I literally wrote down, “Oh god the monologue!!” at one point when Faora was destroying the Ihop.  It was just a series of grandiose, pathetic one-liners about how weak Superman was [uh, really?] and how they were going to kill everyone he loved, repeated over and over with increasing volume and intensity.
CASTING COMMENTS:
  • I adored Russell Crowe as Jor-El.  He stole every scene he was in.  I was surprised that I could not take my eyes off him [and I’m not a huge Crowe fan in general].
  • Also, Diane Lane did a phenomenal job as Martha Kent.  So often the mothers (or aunts, in Spidey’s case) of super heroes come across as overprotective or a little weak.  Not so.  She showed her own inner steel, facing down Zod and planning to rebuild the Kent home.
  • Kevin Costner as Jonathan Kent was only slightly overshadowed by his wife.  After the first somewhat awkward scene with his son, he really shone as a kind, gentle father figure.
  • Henry Cavill himself did a great job as the title character.  He was tall, broad-shouldered, cleft-chinned, and blue-eyed, but I didn’t get the “pretty boy” feeling that I usually do from Superman actors—perhaps it because the forehead curl was gone.
  • Amy Adams was the worst casting call.  I don’t think she was completely awful, but she did not embody Lois Lane in any way.  She made silly decisions, and put herself in harm’s way, not because she could handle it, but because she appears to be too dumb to know any better.  Physically she didn’t fit the part either.  Her face was simply not the full, happy face of Superman’s lady-love.  [And her hair was so flat!!!  Someone grab her a can of mousse STAT!!!]

Considering that I just sat through another 2 ½ hour long Superman origin story…  I loved this movie, and I cannot wait to see the next movie from Zack Snyder.   Four and a half Death Stars from me for this one!

4.5 Death Stars

FINAL THOUGHT:  DID ANYONE ELSE SEE THE SIGN FOR LEXCORP IN ONE OF THE NYC FLYOVERS?????????? 😀 😀 😀

Leave a comment

Filed under Editorial, Movie Reviews, Movies, Tracy Gronewold

Review: Man of Steel

Warning: This review contains spoilers for Man of Steel.

Image

I spent nearly all last weekend humming the theme from Superman.  This was, of course, in preparation to go see Man of Steel last Sunday.  I wouldn’t say I was excited about this movie, but I was certainly optimistic.  Knowing that both Christopher Nolan and Zach Snyder were involved gave me hope that this wouldn’t be another disaster like Superman Returns.  So on Sunday afternoon I happily hopped in my car and drove off to see what this latest Superman installment had to offer.

Thankfully, there is plenty of good to say about this movie.  First off there is the casting.  With one exception, this movie boasts an outstanding cast.  Even the small roles in this film were enjoyable to watch.  Regular sci-fi movie and TV viewers will certainly recognize several character actors.  A personal favorite of mine, Richard Schiff of West Wing fame, had a fantastic supporting role as Dr. Emil Hamilton.  A couple of surprise performances really stood out in the leading roles.  Chief among these is Kevin Costner as Jonathan Kent.  His performance is all the best of Field of Dreams, with none of the debacle that was Waterworld.  He demonstrates fabulous understanding of his character’s place in this world, acting as a guiding light for the young and unsure Clark.

Russell Crowe also impresses as doomed Kryptonian scientist Jor-El.  Even when he returns as a hologram, Crowe manages to project a solid screen presence.  There was something quite fitting about watching these two outstanding fathers on Father’s Day.

Diane Lane plays a very capable Martha Kent.  Although one scene between Lane and a young Clark in his elementary school was awkward and a bit lacking, the scenes between adult Clark and his mother are fantastic.  One in particular outside their home is both emotionally touching and visually quite appealing, with wonderful lighting from a seemingly endless sky.  Although she is always the caring, loving mother, she is by no means a shrinking violet.  Like many farm raised women, she also has a tough side that is harder than steel, appropriate given the man who is her adopted son.

Image

Is there a barber in the house?!

Speaking of steel, tall and handsome, with a head of thick black hair (minus the Christopher Reeve curl, thank God), Henry Cavill certainly looks the part of the man himself, and convincingly steps into some pretty big tights left behind by a sizeable list of actors.

The role of Superman is always a difficult one to play because in reality it’s actually two very different characters that look identical.  In fact, previous films have considered casting two separate actors to play each half of Kal-el’s nature; but in this film, Cavill captures both personas very well.  This Clark is written less like the Christopher Reeves’ Clark and more like Smallville’s Clark played by Tom Welling.  Personally, I would have liked to see more of the awkward, bumbling, yet oh-so-loveable Clark Kent of the Daily Planet and am looking forward to seeing more of him in future films.  Cavill’s portrayal focused mostly on the alienation Clark feels because his powers keep him from fitting in.  While this was an important plot point in the evolution of Superman, it probably should have been less emphasized and drawn out.

My only casting complaint comes in the form of Amy Adams as Lois Lane.  Instead of having a spunky, devil-may-care attitude, Adams plays Lane with recklessness and disregard that is more than a little alarming.  I regularly found myself asking why in Krypton Lois was doing something that no marginally sane person would ever attempt.  I also found Adams to be an unconvincing romantic interest. Superman and Lois’s relationship is one of the staples of comic romance, and this film made it all feel rather unimpressive.

The tone and visual aesthetic of the film definitely takes its cue from executive producer Christopher Nolan.  While nowhere near as gloomy and sinister as the Dark Knight Trilogy, Man of Steel has a certain somewhat melancholy and muted quality that has not been seen in the other films in the Superman franchise.  At times this makes it difficult to believe in the hope the film tries so desperately to convey.  The one place this visual does work is in the death of Krypton.  Watching the end of Superman’s home planet is truly heartbreaking, leaving me with a “there but for the grace of god” feeling.  The destruction of Superman’s home planet is caused solely by the actions and inactions of its citizenry.  It’s not too difficult to envision humanity reaching this same point if we are unwilling to stop thinking only of ourselves and our own immediate gain.  The obvious hints at current events (some of which were only imagined at the time of filming) only make the message more poignant.

Director Zach Snyder once again brings his own particular visual style to the screen which balances Nolan’s darker tone beautifully.  Although I enjoyed Watchmen and Sucker Punch, they were both overwhelming at times.  Man of Steel kept much of the same feel without the stimulus overload.  The generous, though not indulgent, use of this aesthetic is brilliant.  The best of these scenes was the conversation between Zod and Clark that takes place entirely in Clark’s head.  Quickly shifting settings and costumes provides a dramatic element in what would otherwise just be a boring, clichéd villain monologue.

The plot of Man of Steel revolves around the all too familiar origin of Superman, which at this point has been told and retold countless times.  However, this is one of the best that I’ve ever seen; just short of Grant Morrison’s All-Star Superman.  The decision to use General Zod as the villain, instead of the old fall back Lex Luthor (yes, I saw the Lex-Corp signs; nice touch), was inspired.  Luthor, although Superman’s arch-nemesis, is a mere mortal man; not a believable threat to the near demi-god that is the Man of Steel.  Zod, on the other hand, presents a threat that is physically equal to Superman and considerably more experienced.

What I enjoyed most about Man of Steel is the little details.  I loved the total beating that Superman takes at the hands of his fellow Kryptonians.  Throughout his life, Clark has been forced to be a pacifist because of his abilities.  While this eventually makes him the hero we know and love, it also means that until this point he has never been in a real fight.  While Clark manages to hold his own because he has already adapted to Earth’s environment, it is obvious that the professional soldiers squaring off against him have a considerable advantage from experience.

This leads me to watching young Clark acclimating to his powers and then later watching the newly arrived Kyptonians’ laborious on the fly adaptation.  When Clark’s powers first manifested he was hardly able to control them and it took him many years to reach the level of mastery we see him demonstrate in the beginning of the film.  The Phantom Zone prisoners however did not have this lifetime of practice with which to master their newfound powers.  They were forced to adapt on a significantly advanced learning curve.  The progression of Clark’s mastery of his power was made more believable by the Kryptonians’ struggle.  The Kryptonians can’t even fly for most of the movie; instead they are forced to leap tall buildings in a single bound.

Since this is a reboot of the Superman film franchise, there were obviously some changes made to the story to make it more relevant to modern audiences and to purge stuff that didn’t make sense or served no real purpose, and I was totally cool with them.  Although it has been a part of the costume since the beginning, I’ve never been a big fan of the red trunks (or red briefs) on the outside of the costume.  I shed no tears for their departure from the Superman mythos.

One change that did disappoint me a bit was the death of Jonathan Kent.  This is one of the pivotal events in the life of Clark Kent; often the one which ultimately leads to him to become Superman. Traditionally Clark’s father dies of a heart attack, something that Clark is powerless to prevent.  In the updated version however, Kent dies in a tornado, refusing to allow Clark to save him for fear of exposing his son’s abilities.  It makes the scene much more touching—the idea of yet another father sacrificing himself for Clark’s sake—but I think something is lost in the change.  In the previous films, Kent’s death reminded the audience that even with his almost god-like powers, Superman is not omnipotent.  Such a deep, personal loss gave us a sense of his humanity.

The majority of the movie was fairly predictable, but for me, the end is where things came apart, all in one rather awful scene: Superman is forced to kill Zod to prevent him from killing more innocent people.  I understand that from the standpoint of a non-fanboy this may have worked and even seemed to be a right choice, but all I could feel was vast disappointment.  I am aware that the Superman of the comics has killed before, when the need has arisen, and that this isn’t that same Superman with seventy-five years of canon to support him.  However, Superman is meant to inspire us to be better than we are; to appeal to those things that are best in humanity.  Being that example means showing mercy.  It means believing that someone can change, even if it comes with the risk that they fall back on their old ways.  There is something decidedly wrong in a comic universe where Superman kills Zod while Batman allows Joker to live.  Certainly both deserve death, and the chance for reforming either is almost non-existent, but that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be tried.  Maybe I can’t explain why it is okay for Superman to kill Nazis in the ‘40’s but it is not okay for him to kill Zod in 2013, but I do know that it represents a failing of Superman as an ideal.  In killing Zod, for that brief moment, Superman no longer represents what we should all strive to be, but instead shows us the worst that humanity has to offer.  And while maybe necessary, it is still a terrible waste.  To me this plot twist demonstrated a lack of understanding of the character.

Although the ending left a bad taste in my mouth, I, like Superman himself, am hopeful.  There were some absolutely incredible moments in this film that have the potential to make this reboot of Superman everything Geekdom hopes and wants it to be.  With a thoughtful tone and solid cast, this chapter of Man of Steel could finally have the magic that elevates DC films to the next level.  This movie would have gotten a solid 3.5, maybe even 4 Death Stars, but with such a dramatic wrong turn at the ending, I just can’t bring myself to give it any more than 2.5 Death Stars.  I look forward to the next installment of this new franchise with hope!

2.5 Death Stars

Leave a comment

Filed under Andrew Hales, Movie Reviews, Movies

Around the Web June 15, 2013

In the Winning Science post this week, I was wondering what awesome things the Japanese knew that the rest of us hadn’t quite figured out yet.  This is NOT what I had in mind.  Even for the Japanese, this one is pretty weird.

Image

I didn’t realize that the Japanese even had emo bands.  Now I feel guilty, they send us nice cars, tvs and video games and in return we send them emo bands.  I think they’re getting the short end of the stick.

I want this yacht that turns into a submarine.  If I saved all my money, I figure I could probably afford this in a couple millennia.

12609448-1685-48b8-85a5-fe6d5f241dc8_1

And now, in honor of the release of Man of Steel, here is Superman! (from around of the web, of course)

supeman logo wallpaper 02

I understand that everyone gets lucky some at some point, and that some people are more lucky than others, but this is ridiculous.

action-comic-jpg_034345

Last time I put a hole in my wall, all I found was that super itchy pink insulation. Not fair.

While Superman is an important character in the DCU, his other important contribution is as a brand.  I’m sure you’ve seen the sheer volume of Superstuff that has been available lately.

Also, if you’re a Superman fan, you absolutely must listen to Paul Montgomery and Glen Weldon talk about Weldon’s new book Superman: The Unauthorized Biography, its pretty amazing.

supermanbio

Leave a comment

Filed under Around the Web