Tag Archives: movies

Editorial | My Favorite Movie Theater Snacks

I was nineteen years old before I first stepped into a movie theater… yes, that’s correct.  As a child, I was uninitiated into the world of movie theater concession foods.  Some may argue that this was a travesty, and that my life must have been sad and forlorn.  I would argue that this makes me a perfectly (ok, maybe not perfectly) objective reviewer of the types of snacks available at your local Regal® or Cinemark®.

Unlimited refills at the opportunity cost of understanding the twist in the plot.

First up, the perpetual favorite, popcorn.  Popcorn used to be a fantastical, buttery, salty delight, but these days it is actually popped in either coconut or canola oil to make it healthier.  Healthier it may be, but it is far less tasty.  Also, I’m pretty sure that butter flavored stuff in the little pump at the counter that you can add to the popcorn has no actual relation to real cream.  On a positive note, the purchase of a large bucket at Regal® guarantees unlimited refills, if you’re the kind of person who is ok with quietly slipping out in the middle of a movie and missing ten or fifteen minutes.

Next is soda… or pop… or cola… or coke… depending on your local dialect.  My biggest beef with soda at the concession counter is that movie theaters only serve one brand or the other.  You cannot get Dr Pepper in a Pepsi theater, and you cannot get Mountain Dew in a Coca-Cola theater.  It is sad.  Also, for whatever reason, the concession attendants always put way too much ice in the drink—even when I ask for little ice.  Fountain drinks are slightly weaker than bottled drinks anyway, and this means that the last third of the cup will basically be water that is slightly flavored with the previous beverage.  Also, I feel the desperate need to drink the whole thing, which means that I always need an intermission, but I am also stubborn and refuse to miss any of the movie, which causes a… dilemma.

These are one of the few boxed candies that don’t also have a bag inside the box, so the chance of annoying other movie goers is minimized.

This brings me to Mike & Ikes.  I love Mike & Ikes and their sibling, Hot Tamales.  The benefit to these candies is written in large letters right on the front of the box: ZERO TRANS FATS.  Of course, this is probably negated by the large soda that will be making me dance in my seat in about eighty seven minutes.

I also love Sour Skittles.  In my head, the story of Sour Skittles’ creation goes like this:  Skittles guys had just made the weird tasting Skittles in the purple bag, and they got together for a conference.  They all congratulated each other that they had gotten all the people who love regular Skittles to buy the weird tasting Skittles, because they thought they would love them, and suddenly one of the guys bursts into tears and says, “My Skittles brethren, I love sour things, and we have not made anything that is sour, and now I am sad.” So obviously, all the other Skittles guys pat him on the back and console him and one of them says, “You know what we need to make??  Sour Skittles!!!” And so, just a decade or so after the purple bag Skittles, we have Sour Skittles.  I do love sour things, so I always get sucked into buying these things.  Unfortunately, I still have that afore mentioned desperate need to finish it off, so by the time my tongue is protesting the sour sugary coating, there are still seven or eight Skittles in the bottom of the bag and I always eat them.  By this point the skin on my tongue feels like it is peeling and shriveling all at once, but there is still a little pile of sour sugar in the bottom of the bag that I must eat.  It is painful, but it is a beautiful pain.

Last, but not least, some theaters serve pizza.  This is a huge predicament for me, because I adore pizza in all of its forms.  I feel unfulfilled if I have not at least tried any item that boasts pizza flavoring.  Inevitably, I give in to this craving, only to discover that the pizza is always a circular piece of cardboard coated in tomato sauce, with several shavings of cheese and sometimes even a pepperoni or two.  Usually, I am forced to show my disappointment by slurping loudly at the last remaining drops of flavored water at the bottom of my giant drink.

This is NOT what your pizza will actually look like.

What movie foods do YOU love?  Got an alternative to this list?  Let me know in the comments.

2 Comments

Filed under Editorial, Tracy Gronewold

Editorial | The Picky Entertainment Consumer

Due to a secluded childhood in a religious family, for many years my exposure to most entertainment was quite limited.  Now, as an adult, I am very often disappointed in the quality of entertainment in all forms, whether it be movies, comics, or games.  Don’t even ask me about popular books these days.  In order to suspend my disbelief (more on this in a later blog), entertainment must hit a number of points on the quality checklist I have in my head.  I have had my selective taste called into question by my friends many times, (::cough::Andrew::cough::) most recently as I prepared for my review of Saga; so I think it would be a good thing to point out why I am so demanding, and why a more discerning consumer can only be good for entertainment.  For your consideration, here is a rather foreshortened list.

This meme was based on my life.

This meme was based on my life.

First of all, any piece of entertainment—and in this case, that mostly refers to movies—that considers itself dumb entertainment (i.e. Dumb and Dumber, The Hangover 1-3, and anything with Will Ferrell) almost always gets a pass from me.  This isn’t the type of entertainment that I enjoy and I definitely have a little less respect for an individual who seeks out this type of entertainment.  At the same time, I also do not feel that these movies try to classify themselves as anything but stupid humor, so at least I don’t feel that the marketing hype is lying.

The next type that I see is entertainment that tries to be suspenseful and intriguing (“smart” entertainment), but in the end falls woefully short.  Often this happens when a piece of entertainment, such as a movie or a book, sets up a system of natural laws that apply within the created universe of the piece, and then breaks those laws by mistake.  My favorite example of this (and by favorite, I mean: the one to which I refer in my long-winded rants) is The Lake House.  The idea of the movie is that a woman is able to write letters to the man who previously owned her house.  The twist is that she is writing to the man two years before the present and he has since died.  In the end, he stops writing, and she realizes that in his timeline, he has died, but then she is somehow able to still write him before he has died to give him instructions to avoid his fatal car accident.  No matter how you work it out, the timeline of events isn’t even possible within the supernatural parameters of the of the movie.

But it has Keanu. How can you go wrong?

But it has Keanu. How can you go wrong?

Another issue I have that is related to item one, but can also be separated into its own class.  Inconsistencies in entertainment drive me completely bonkers.  Book series’s often fall into this trap in descriptions of characters—for instance, the heroine will be described with long, flowing, brunette hair and stunning, blue eyes in the first book, only to have green eyes by book three.

I’ve spoken before here on the blog about the frustration I feel with inaccurate historical portrayals, so I will not dwell on this point for too long.  Suffice to say that even small details, such as the moments in Gettysburg in which the Union army is shown scraping beans from the bottom of the can, juxtaposed with a Confederate officer announcing to General Lee that there is plenty of fruit and some buckwheat pancakes to eat, can give an audience completely the wrong idea about a historical event (and subconciously advise them on which side is right and which is wrong).

Last but not least, entertainment that heavy-handedly preaches the opinion or philosophy of its creators is perhaps the most grating frustration that I have with modern media of any kind.  Entertainment, for me, is an escape from a life filled with stress and frustration.  I highly dislike sitting down to enjoy a good book, only to realize that the author is not telling a story, but instead preaching a social more with which I do not agree.

All in all, across all forms of entertainment medium few pieces capture my undivided attention, and leave me satisfied.  This is not a bad thing!  After all, the classics that have remained from by-gone eras of literature, film, and music are the solitary beacons of excellence in a sea of medocrity of their time.  Therefore, with or without Andrew’s permission, I will continue to be a picky consumer with pride.

Leave a comment

Filed under Editorial, Tracy Gronewold

Review: The Wolverine

the_wolverine_teaser_one-sheet

“I’m Wolverine. I’m the best at what I do, but what I do isn’t very nice”.  Ok, so that quote isn’t in The Wolverine, but it has always been true.  This movie is no exception.  The Wolverine provides plenty of high energy action as well as some nice quiet moments which are used to explore the thoughts going on inside Logan’s head.  All said and done this was a fun summer action movie, but while certainly better than X-Men Origins: Wolverine there was still some room for improvement.

Prior to seeing the film on Friday night, I had intentionally avoided reading or watching almost anything about the film as much as possible.  While parts of X-Men Origins: Wolverine were good, overall I was not impressed and I wanted to come into this film with as clean a slate as I could.  This meant that until about fifteen minutes into the movie I wasn’t quite sure where in the X-Men film timeline this film took place.  This is not necessarily a bad thing, but I had assumed it would be a direct sequel to the first Wolverine movie.  Instead it takes place sometime after the events of X-Men: The Last Stand.

After an opening flashback sequence, we find Logan living on the fringes of society, sleeping in the woods, haunted by nightmares of things he’s done.  A quick few scenes occur in Wolverine’s native Canada and then viewers are off to Japan, where the real story begins.  This story taps into material from the Frank Miller Wolverine mini-series as well as the first story arc of the Wolverine on-going series that followed.

The first thing I’d like to mention is that they fixed the biggest problem I had with the last movie:  the CGI claws. For whatever reason, in several scenes of the previous Wolverine movie, the CGI claws look incredibly low budget and just plain bad.  That was not the case this time around. I don’t know if it was due to better CGI or the possible increased use of physical claws, but it did the trick.

I had no issue with the plot.  I have only a passing knowledge of this particular portion of Wolverine comics, so the movie seemed to line up well enough with what I already knew.

Hugh Jackman’s portrayal of Wolverine is still fantastic.  He has a great understanding of the character and it appears that he truly enjoys putting on the claws and sideburns to become Wolverine.

Okamoto-Mariko

I think it’s a pretty good fit.

Playing Wolverine’s love interest, Mariko, was new comer Tao Okamoto.  I liked her performance, but it did seem as though she is new to film acting.  With a bit more time and experience I think she could do some interesting things.

Fellow model-turned-actress Rila Fukushima served as a sidekick of sorts to Wolverine and served well enough in the role, though her English was a bit choppy and that wore on me after a while.  Several of the other cast members looked familiar to me, but I couldn’t place them and had to look them up on IMDB.  Mariko’s father, Shingen, was played by Hiroyuki Sanada, who I knew as Kaneda in Sunshine, and Yashida, played by Hal Yamanouchi, had a small role in 2004’s The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou.

The phrase “big superhero movie” implies several things, chief among which is action. The Wolverine delivers on the action pretty consistently though the movie.  All actions movies have their peaks and valleys, but this one seemed to have many more of both. Shorter, more frequent periods of calm were punctuated by action sequences of varying length. Since the movie was rated PG-13, the amount of violence that could be shown was minimal, but it was still obvious that Wolverine is still the best at what he does—slashing and stabbing people.

Unfortunately, the action scenes lead me into what I didn’t like about the movie.  I cannot stand shaky camera work, and many of the action sequences were shot using this terrible technique. I understand that the idea is to try and convey a sense of movement and the chaos of a fight, but instead it just causes viewers confusion and really bad visuals. Some of these scenes would look so much better they didn’t feel like a Parkinson’s patient was holding the camera. On a positive note, the panoramic scenery shots were wonderful.  They really make me want to visit Australia, where the film was shot.

My other biggest complaint has to do with the considerable amount of prior knowledge necessary to really enjoy most of this film.  At various points in the movie, Logan dreams about Jean Grey.  Although I have always loved her character, her inclusion without any explanation made for some confusion.  I also felt that Jean’s presence in this movie was unnecessary. It’s not that I didn’t like the actress who played her or how they used her; I just think the movie would have been perfectly fine without her in it.

I would also like to point out that there were far too many secondary villains.  There were 5 different characters that I would classify as secondary villains, in addition to the final bad guy, the Silver Samurai. The only saving grace in this is that unlike Iron Man 2, which suffered from too many villains with separate plots running at the same time, all of Wolverine’s foes tied into a single interwoven plot.  viperAlso, the use of Viper as a secondary villain confused even me. I have a fair amount of Marvel Comics knowledge and I had to look her up when I got home. I’m sure there was another more prominent villain that they could have used.  I’m also unsure of her previous connections to Wolverine in the comic universe.

In both the comic and the movie universes Wolverine is a major fan favorite, and yet for some reason, these movies keep falling short of achieving their full potential. I have heard nothing about a potential sequel, and this weekend’s box office take makes me doubt the likelihood a bit, but the increase in quality makes me believe that a third movie could really be something special.  While I liked the movie, I wasn’t wowed by it and there were some considerable flaws that detracted from the overall enjoyment of the movie. Moreover, the amount of background knowledge needed makes this a difficult jumping on point for new movie goers.  I give The Wolverine 3 out of 5 Death Stars.

3 Death Stars

Leave a comment

Filed under Andrew Hales, Movie Reviews, Movies

SDCC Wrap Up

San Diego Comic Con has come and gone, and while I was unable to attend I have kept up to date with the latest and coolest announcements. I’m going to take a minute and cover some of the things that I’m most excited about. This is by no means an exhaustive list; it’s just what has piqued my interest.

 

COMICS

Obviously there are going to be plenty of comic book announcements coming from a comic book convention. Probably the most interesting announcements are coming out of IDW. Next year looks rather bright for them with a new Walt Simonson Viking series called Ragnarők, an artist edition of another Simonson title Star Slammers; An artist edition of Hellboy in Hell (which I plan to preorder as soon as I can); and a new series Little Nemo: Return to Slumberland.Nemo_Teaser_color_2.2 I’m certain most people are unfamiliar with Little Nemo (nothing to do with Finding Nemo), but I have been unable to find this favorite of my childhood since I was about twelve and I am super excited for a chance to return to this universe. The fact that it comes from the writers of Locke & Key, about whom I have heard nothing but good things , excites me even further.

Speaking of hearing good things, this year’s Eisner awards were announced the Friday of the convention and not surprisingly, Saga has done very well for itself, winning both Best Continuing Series and Best New Series as well as a Best Writer award for Brian K. Vaughan. This shouldn’t be any surprise as it’s Vaughan’s third Eisner for Best New Series and his second for Best Writer, but I don’t care. This series is amazing and it deserves recognition. While I would have also loved to see Fiona Staples win (or be nominated for that matter), David Aja’s wins for Best Cover Artist and Best Penciler/Inker nearly make up for this. I honestly don’t care about Hawkeye as a character, but I keep reading the book because Aja’s amazing art and Fraction’s superior writing.

hawkeye-david-aja

Finally, coming out of Marvel’s catch-all Cup O’ Joe panel are two announcements that make me hopeful. First up is Young Avengers Afterparty. I’m not much of an after-party fan, but Young Avengers has been very enjoyable so far and this should be a nice Christmas time wrap up of the story arc. It also promises to include some shorter stories about a couple of the characters, including one of my favorites, Pixie.

The second of Mr. Quesada’s announcements is that a new series called Revolutionary War, featuring many second and third string UK based characters is on its way. I like these kinds of series. There is always so much room to develop these characters in whatever new ways the creative teams wants to take it. I will admit that not knowing a single character that’s going to be in the series, I’m cautiously optimistic.

 

MOVIES

What would SDCC be without movie announcements? It might be all about comics and who really wants that (Oh the humanity!). This year is no exception. Right off the bat we have The Avengers: Age of Ultron. After The Avengers turned into a mega-blockbuster last summer, we all knew that a sequel was on its way, but I assumed, based on the Easter Egg, that the villain would be Thanos, the Mad Titan. Turns out I was wrong. It looks like Marvel is saving that one for film number three (as well as for Guardians of the Galaxy) and instead we get one of the Avengers’ greatest foes, Ultron. ultronFor those who don’t know, Ultron is an artificial intelligence created by original Avenger Hank Pym (Ant Man). It eventually turns on him and becomes an incredibly intelligent, ever evolving, homicidal robot who frequently tries to kill our beloved heroes. Ultimately, this is a villain I can get behind, and I’m pleased with the announcement.

trask

This is going to be fun. The mustache says so.

Now from the other side of the street, over at DC there are two big pieces of movie news. First and probably most controversial is that the upcoming Man of Steel sequel will include Superman and Batman working as a team. I’m not really sure how I feel about this. Man of Steel left us with so much potential for more adventures with Superman that I’m a little disappointed they feel the need to do a crossover between the two franchises so soon. Also the fact that Christian Bale will likely not be returning for the film adds to my apprehension. For all his flaws as a person, Bale played a very really and believable Batman and it will be tough for someone else to fill his shoes.

The second reveal is the post Justice League: Flash Point Paradox/ Justice League: War DC animated films. There is no doubt that while DC has not done well in the feature film market, they are dominating the animated original movie market. There were rumors that after Flash Point that there would only be New 52 based movies, but this is not going to be the case. Not only that, the next two movies will feature Batman. Batman and Son will introduce Damian Wayne to the animated comic universe and Batman: Assault on Arkham will presumably take place somewhere in the Batman: Arkham Asylum video game universe. I’ve been selective on which of the animated films I buy, but I think both of these will make the cut.

 

GAMING

Gaming at SDCC seemed to take a bit of a back seat. Given the massive announcements leading up to and during E3, it’s not surprising that things were a bit more subdued in California. Microsoft showed off some of the new features with the Kinect and Xbox One. The coolest one by far is the fact that the Kinect will recognize unique users and automatically switch user profiles based on who has the controller. I used to go absolutely nuts when my roommate and I would play games because I like inverted controls and he doesn’t. A couple months ago we set up my NES and looking back it’s amazing how far this technology has come along.

The best and worst gaming news however comes from Nintendo. My favorite RPG of all time, Earthbound, is finally being re-released. I have played many RPGs in my day, some of the top titles among them, but none of them quite live up to the awesomeness that is Earthbound. However, it is only being released for the Wii U, a console that I do not own. I am now torn.  Do I wait even longer and hope that it comes out for a system I do own, like 3DS (which can totally hack the graphics), or do I fork out the $350 for the system so I can play this game again? There are certainly pluses and minuses to both sides so this may have to come down the best method of decision making I know of:  flipping a quarter.

earthbound

Alright folks, this is what I loved about SDCC. What did you like? Comment below and let us know what you liked and what you wanted to see more of.

Leave a comment

Filed under Andrew Hales, Events, Geek Life