Category Archives: Editorial

Editorial | What Doesn’t Kill You: socializing with other geeks can make you a better geek

At a recent gathering of geeks—too small to be a convention, and too large to be a D&D adventure—I had the opportunity to see Joss Whedon fans in the wild.  This is a rare occurrence, as these creatures spend most of their time hiding under the covers and sobbing into their pillows.  It was so nice to see others with similar interests and to interact in a large group, although it felt oddly surreal to be seated near a pair of Klingons with their infant son.

Spending time with someone other than a plastic Marvel (or DC) action figure collection will allow an expansion of horizons, both within the realms already known and loved, and in worlds beyond.

For instance, I adore all projects Joss Whedon, but recently, when several of my friends pointed out plot points, nuances, and an entire free, web mini-series that I had missed (Dr. Horrible’s Sing-A-Long Blog, in case there is anyone still uninitiated into that little piece of genius), I realized that I am not quite as knowledgeable as I had once thought.  It was a little bit of a shock, but the conversations I now have are on a completely different level.

muchadomovie.com

Whedon’s new film “Much Ado About Nothing”

It’s also nice to be introduced to new areas of geekdom by those already well-versed in it.  Instead of being overwhelming and intimidating (perhaps to the point that interest is lost), these new spheres of interest are easily explored with the help of a guide.  I have many such experiences with this—especially since it can be daunting to get into such things as Manga, or even the wild, tangled world of comic books, thanks to their snarl of alternate storylines (Spiderman, anyone?).  Several years ago I was introduced to the wonderful world of Japanese anime by my friend Elaina.*  My first experience was a positive one thanks to her direction.  First she had me check out Studio Ghibli, and then the character Yomiko Readman (Agent Paper) in the popular manga/novel series and animated film Read or Die.  I’m nobody’s anime buff—not even close—but I can now speak with some small knowledge on the subject thanks to Elaina.

A healthy brain is one that is regularly challenged to work hard, and an easy way to challenge it is to hang around other intelligent people.  I found this out the hard way a few years ago when I looked up from my full-time job in retail to realize that I didn’t know anyone smarter than I.  It might sound like an opportunity to show off, or even a chance to be promoted rapidly, but in reality it was just boring and frustrating.  Since then I’ve cultivated friendships with some brilliant people around my own age that not only keep me humble but actually stretch my cognitive powers and force me to learn and remember to my full potential.  The challenge is exciting and keeps me hungry for information.

Spending time reveling in one’s own creative genius has the tendency to give an inflated view of one’s own cleverness, but there is always someone more intelligent.  This was illustrated beautifully in The Big Bang Theory’s character Sheldon Cooper.  The character is a brilliant, but narcissistic physicist who is ridiculously arrogant about his own cerebral abilities.  Not until Stephen Hawking points out an elementary, mathematical mistake in his paper on the Higgs-Boson particle does Sheldon realize he is as human as the friends he insults on a daily basis.

It may sound difficult to seek out people of similar brain capacity—society frowns upon those who ask for Mensa scores immediately after an introduction—but they can often be found in these very gatherings.  It’s no happenstance that some of the brightest minds of our time are self-proclaimed geeks, so there is no better way to find some of them than in a meeting of geek minds.

Jayne Cobb hat

“Man wears a hat like that, people know he ain’t afraid of anything.”

Lastly, spending time in the company of other geeks fosters a sense of cultural identity.  It is proof that no geek is alone, and validates his passions.  There is nothing quite like the feeling of acceptance that comes from seeing another Browncoat in a Jayne hat.  Here, not only are those things that make a geek so painfully awkward at times in the outside world not awkward, they are normal!

The wisest man in the world lived about three thousand years before the term “geek” was coined, but his thirst for knowledge made him one all the same; and he said, “Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.”  Come to think of it, my authentic replica Medieval battle axe could use a whetstone.  Maybe it’s time to get some friends together for a little LARPing and some good, old-fashioned, geek socializing.

*name changed

2 Comments

Filed under Editorial, Tracy Gronewold

Editorial | History and Hollywood: the academic irresponsibility of making big box entertainment based on historical time periods & events

I walk into my office almost twenty minutes early, cursing traffic.  If I leave at 8:00 a.m., I arrive fifteen to twenty minutes early, but if I leave at 8:05 a.m., I will inevitably be five minutes late.  Several of my coworkers are already in the office booting up their computers, getting coffee, and chatting about their weekends.  Amy* wanders over to my cubicle.  “So… I saw that movie Lincoln this weekend,” she says, smiling mysteriously into the coffee she is stirring (That has nothing to do with the story. Amy always tries to smile mysteriously.  No one at work is sure why.).  I give her the obligatory response, “Oh really?  What did you think?”

“It was really good!” she answers, “It really made me think about that time in history.  How brave they were, you know?  Also that one black soldier guy at the beginning was hot.”

Steam begins to pour from my ears.  “It was a terrible movie,” I reply, because I cannot help myself, “Historically it was wildly inaccurate, from the attitudes and behavior of the characters and the details on the uniforms right down to the actual vote by the state representatives.  I almost walked out of the theater.”

Black soldiers in the Union army as depicted in "Lincoln."

Black soldiers in the Union army as depicted in “Lincoln.”

Amy’s eyes widen and she shakes her head.  “Well, I enjoyed it…” she says, her voice trailing off, and she heads back to her desk.

Yes, I’m the office history geek, and I bristle whenever Hollywood decides to make a movie supposedly based on a historical event or even just a story based within a particular historical time period.  For me, going to see a historical movie is almost always just an opportunity to point out the ridiculous details that the movie gets wrong.  However, the problem is that very few people who see these movies realize that there are any errors at all, meaning that they walk away from the theater with a false understanding of history and no motivation to seek out the truth.

Actual black soldiers in the Union army.

Actual black soldiers in the Union army.

Hollywood has built an empire on storytelling, not on truth telling.  As a general rule, movies have no problems bending the truth or even snapping it in half altogether, as in the 1955 release of The Far Horizons, which pitted Meriwether Lewis and his purported love interest Sacagawea against the nefarious French trapper Charbonneau.  If this had been accurate in the slightest, it would have made for a very awkward road trip, as Sacagawea was, in fact, married to Charbonneau.

Not only are filmmakers unconcerned about the accuracy of their storylines, but they also add modern behavior and attitudes to period roles, presumably to allow modern viewers to identify with the characters.  My least favorite trope is the “independent woman” set in a time period when women were not given political rights or even much of a say in anything.  A great example of this is Cate Blanchett’s role as Marion Loxley in the 2010 film Robin Hood.  If the entertainment industry were to be believed, in every historical era (or at least, in every historical era that makes for good screenplay) there have been hundreds of women not only protesting their downtroddenness verbally, but actually taking up arms, or sneaking into lecture halls and mocking the intellectuals there—presumably to make them see that all women are intelligent, sensible, and mature.

However, all the blame for these awful movies cannot be placed at the feet of the movie industry.  The average consumer is also culpable.  At their very best, the uninformed public is simply lazy, preferring to have their facts served up with a disproportional serving of sugary entertainment.  For proof, one need only look at 2001’s Pearl Harbor.  The deaths of almost 2,500 Americans were, apparently, not dramatic enough, so the writers added a creepy love triangle to both thrill and disturb their audience.

At worst, deliberate ignorance on all levels is at epidemic proportions.  As a former high school tutor, I was aghast at the lack of historical knowledge that I found in tenth and eleventh grade students.  In college history classes the ignorance is even more appalling.  By one’s second year in undergraduate education here in the US, it can be expected that a student will have a decent grasp of United States history, but such is not the case.  Students have plenty to say about the Peace Corps and Habitat for Humanity, but not do even know the name Nathan Hale or John Jay.

While I have heard the argument that these movies and TV shows inspire people to research the history that is presented, I must say that as a whole, the entertainment industry doesn’t point out how far their narrative is from the truth; nor does it make the true stories readily available, and the average person is too lazy to dig for them.  Even if someone were to hear Lincoln’s issues corrected (probably from me!), first impressions generally stick.  It’s much easier to remember the vivid pictures on a 70’ IMAX screen than it is the dry details in black ink on a white page.

I cannot blame the entertainment industry alone for the pitiful lack of historical knowledge in the United States, but I can and will say that it is irresponsible to make so many deliberately inaccurate movies without doing more to make sure the audiences knows that they are not seeing what actually happened.  I also hold each individual responsible for educating themselves about the fascinating subject that is the history of the human race.  Lastly, I put the obligation on those true students of history to speak up when they see inconsistencies and inaccuracies in entertainment.

We have a society that is, as a whole, woefully ill-informed and too lazy to do anything about it; and Hollywood is feeding the problem.  Perhaps with a concerted effort, entertainment can become more accurate, and entertainees can be better educated.

*Name has been changed to protect the not-so-innocent.

3 Comments

Filed under Editorial, Tracy Gronewold

Editorial | Review: Man of Steel

WARNING: THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS

Overall, I loved Man of Steel.  The visuals were stunning and the sound enhanced the overall feel.  It was nice to go to a movie and not be distracted by sound effects.  I hope that as a genre, comic book movies are moving past the era of ear shattering explosions and crashes.  Don’t get me wrong, I want to hear what is happening on the screen, but I like my eardrums intact.

Unlike others that have seen the movie, I did not have a problem with the final plot “twist.”  As a moviegoer, I found Superman’s decision to kill Zod quite satisfying, considering the fact that the villain had just destroyed an entire city and plotted to wipe out humanity.  The heavy, audible snap of Zod’s neck was a nice touch.

THINGS THAT MADE ME HAPPY BECAUSE THEY WERE MISSING:
  • That bizarre curl on his forehead
  • Crazy outfits and hair on the Kryptonians
  • “Truth, Justice, and the American way.”  [It’s time to retire that phrase]
THINGS THAT MADE ME HAPPY BECAUSE THEY EXISTED:
  • Jor-El.  Wow.  I was blown away.  Did NOT expect Russell Crowe to pull that one off.
  • Slightly crooked teeth and chest hair on Superman [He may be the perfect humanoid, but his physique is not humanly impossible—thank goodness!]
  • A haphazard ponytail with the ponytail holder showing on Lois Lane in the desert!!  This felt so natural and realistic.
  • FLAGS EVERYWHERE!!!!  It’s been a long time since I saw a movie that felt so patriotic.
  • Superman: “I grew up in Kansas.  I’m as American as they come.” [I felt this was a fitting adjustment to his normal catchphrase, see above]
MOMENTS THAT I LOVED:
  • Faora: “Is that what you want me to tell General Zod?  That you are uncooperative?”
    Col. Nathan Hardy: “I don’t care what you tell him.”
  • Superman destroys the surveillance drone, because he’s 100% American.  [I may or may not have fallen in love with him at that moment]
  • Gen. Swanwick: “Captain, why are you smiling?”
    Captain: “I just think he’s kinda hot.”
  • Jor-El: “My son is twice the man you were.”  [According to his DNA structure, isn’t he millions and millions the man Zod is?]
    jor el
PLOT POINTS THAT MADE NO SENSE:
  • Zod declares that either Superman dies or he dies… and then proceeds to remove his greatest strategic advantage by taking off his armor
  • Lois Lane is now one of two people responsible for dropping the “bomb” that will save all humanity.  [Really?!?!  We’re all ok with having a reporter completing a military operation???]
OTHER RANDOM THINGS:
  • Holy product placement, Superman!!!!  I saw Nikon, Ihop, Dodge, Sears, 7-Eleven, U-haul, and the Royals… it’s a drinking game just waiting to be played.
  • “You know what they say, it’s all downhill after the first kiss.”  [Really?  They say that? Pretty sure I’ve never heard that ever.]
  • First moments with both fathers felt campy and forced (Truck bed with Kevin Costner after the bus incident and on the spaceship with Jor-El telling him his history).
  • Also the history sequence was weird and included things that happened at Jor-El’s death.  How did it get programmed onto the drive?
  • The spaceship design was disappointing.  My guess is that artists are trying to make them look like they are of elemental alloys not found on Earth, meaning they must be denser than anything here, but they just look like they’re carved of stone.  There are a million geniuses in Hollywood; surely SOMEONE can come up with a new design.
  • I literally wrote down, “Oh god the monologue!!” at one point when Faora was destroying the Ihop.  It was just a series of grandiose, pathetic one-liners about how weak Superman was [uh, really?] and how they were going to kill everyone he loved, repeated over and over with increasing volume and intensity.
CASTING COMMENTS:
  • I adored Russell Crowe as Jor-El.  He stole every scene he was in.  I was surprised that I could not take my eyes off him [and I’m not a huge Crowe fan in general].
  • Also, Diane Lane did a phenomenal job as Martha Kent.  So often the mothers (or aunts, in Spidey’s case) of super heroes come across as overprotective or a little weak.  Not so.  She showed her own inner steel, facing down Zod and planning to rebuild the Kent home.
  • Kevin Costner as Jonathan Kent was only slightly overshadowed by his wife.  After the first somewhat awkward scene with his son, he really shone as a kind, gentle father figure.
  • Henry Cavill himself did a great job as the title character.  He was tall, broad-shouldered, cleft-chinned, and blue-eyed, but I didn’t get the “pretty boy” feeling that I usually do from Superman actors—perhaps it because the forehead curl was gone.
  • Amy Adams was the worst casting call.  I don’t think she was completely awful, but she did not embody Lois Lane in any way.  She made silly decisions, and put herself in harm’s way, not because she could handle it, but because she appears to be too dumb to know any better.  Physically she didn’t fit the part either.  Her face was simply not the full, happy face of Superman’s lady-love.  [And her hair was so flat!!!  Someone grab her a can of mousse STAT!!!]

Considering that I just sat through another 2 ½ hour long Superman origin story…  I loved this movie, and I cannot wait to see the next movie from Zack Snyder.   Four and a half Death Stars from me for this one!

4.5 Death Stars

FINAL THOUGHT:  DID ANYONE ELSE SEE THE SIGN FOR LEXCORP IN ONE OF THE NYC FLYOVERS?????????? 😀 😀 😀

Leave a comment

Filed under Editorial, Movie Reviews, Movies, Tracy Gronewold